Could gravitons be dimensionless?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jcap
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Graviton Gravitons
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the nature of gravitons, specifically whether they can be considered dimensionless. Participants explore the implications of the metric being dimensionless and how this relates to the properties of gravitons as quantum excitations of the metric. The conversation touches on theoretical aspects of gravitation and the relationship between gravitons and classical gravitational waves.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that if the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is dimensionless, then gravitons, as excitations of this metric, might also be dimensionless.
  • Others question whether the detection of classical gravitational waves implies that gravitons cannot be dimensionless, drawing a parallel to photons.
  • A participant distinguishes between two meanings of "dimensionless": one referring to the absence of associated dimensional units and the other to having zero size.
  • Another participant argues that if gravitons are excitations of the gravitational potential ##\Phi##, which is dimensionless in natural units, then gravitons must also be dimensionless, unlike other fields and their associated particles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of the dimensionality of gravitons, with no consensus reached on whether they can be considered dimensionless.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes assumptions about the nature of the metric and the properties of gravitational fields, which may not be universally accepted. The relationship between classical gravitational waves and the dimensionality of gravitons remains unresolved.

jcap
Messages
166
Reaction score
12
If the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is dimensionless and gravitons are quantum excitations of the metric does that mean that gravitons themselves are dimensionless?

I say this as locally the metric is just the flat metric ##\eta_{\mu\nu}=\hbox{diag}(-1,1,1,1)## with the dimensions in the co-ordinates ##x^\mu##.

To put it another way:

Is graviton energy included in the stress-energy tensor ##T_{\mu\nu}##?

Actually classical gravitational waves can be detected so does that imply that gravitons can't be dimensionless?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jcap said:
Actually classical gravitational waves can be detected so does that imply that gravitons can't be dimensionless?
Photons can be detected - so does that imply that they can't be dimensionless?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Demystifier
jcap said:
If the metric ##g_{\mu\nu}## is dimensionless and gravitons are quantum excitations of the metric does that mean that gravitons themselves are dimensionless?

Are you asking if they are point particles, or something deeper than that?
 
ohwilleke said:
Are you asking if they are point particles, or something deeper than that?
Ah, you beat me to it! :cool:

I was about to ask whether there might possibly be some confusion between two meanings of "dimensionless":

1. Not having associated dimensional units (e.g. in SI a.k.a. MKS units). The fine structure constant is dimensionless in this sense.

2. Having zero size, in some sense (e.g. an electron versus a proton)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
I mean (1) : not having dimensional units.

In terms of Newtonian gravitation we have the gravitational potential given by:

$$\Phi \sim -\frac{G M}{R}$$

In natural units, ##\hbar=c=1## (dimensionless), Newton's gravitational constant is ##G=1/M_{pl}^2## where ##M_{pl}## is the Planck mass. Therefore the dimensions of the gravitational field ##\Phi## is

$$[\Phi] = \frac{[M]^{-2}[M]}{[M]^{-1}}=1$$

If gravitons are excitations of ##\Phi## then they must themselves be dimensionless.

This is unlike other fields and their associated particles that have dimensions of mass/energy ##[M]##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: ohwilleke
OK. It is now much more clear what you mean.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K