Could N=8 Supergravity Challenge the Foundations of Asymptotic Safety?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter atyy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gravity
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the implications of N=8 supergravity for the concept of asymptotic safety in quantum gravity. Participants explore the potential for N=8 supergravity to be ultraviolet (UV) finite and its relevance to string theory, as well as the broader implications for quantum field theories that include gravity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that recent calculations suggest N=8 supergravity may be less divergent than previously thought, raising questions about its implications for asymptotic safety and string theory.
  • Others highlight that even if N=8 supergravity is UV finite to all orders, it may not be a sensible full quantum theory, citing concerns about the need for a nonperturbative UV completion.
  • One participant references a viewpoint that the full quantum theory of N=8 supergravity is effectively M-theory compactified on T7, regardless of initial assumptions.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the perturbative finiteness of N=8 supergravity, emphasizing that order-by-order finiteness does not guarantee the overall finiteness of the perturbation series.
  • Some argue for the study of N=8 supergravity due to its status as a nontrivial quantum field theory that is both perturbatively finite and includes gravity, despite its phenomenological limitations.
  • Participants mention the aesthetic appeal of N=8 supergravity and its mathematical richness, as well as its connections to other theories like N=4 super Yang-Mills (SYM).

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion reflects a mix of agreement and disagreement. While there is recognition of the theoretical significance of N=8 supergravity, participants express differing views on its viability as a complete quantum theory and the implications of its perturbative finiteness.

Contextual Notes

Participants note limitations in the understanding of N=8 supergravity, including unresolved questions about the perturbative series' convergence and the implications of E7(7) invariance in relation to black hole mass spectra.

atyy
Science Advisor
Messages
15,170
Reaction score
3,378
Asymptotic safety is a scenario in which gravity is not emergent, ie. degrees of freedom at low energy are sufficient for a complete description at high energy.

Calculations from Bern and colleagues have been showing that N=8 supergravity is less divergent than previously suspected. A new paper from Kallosh http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.1135 states "30 years ago N=8 supergravity in four dimensions was suspected to be UV divergent at higher loop orders. The suspicion was based on a construction of an infinite set of superinvariants [6, 7] in a Lorentz covariant on shell superspace geometry with 32 Grassmann coordinates. These counterterms were viewed as candidates for UV divergences. 2 years ago one of the accusers proposed to restore the presumption of innocence ... Thus, in this paper N=8 d = 4 supergravity is acquitted from the previous accusation in [6, 7] and is predicted to be UV finite if there are no anomalies violating the equivalence theorem for physical observables."

What might the implications of this be for Asymptotic Safety, and for string theory?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
http://arxiv.org/abs/1009.1643
E7(7) constraints on counterterms in N=8 supergravity
Niklas Beisert, Henriette Elvang, Daniel Z. Freedman, Michael Kiermaier, Alejandro Morales, Stephan Stieberger

" ... the question of whether the loop computations based on generalized unitarity [4] could yield a UV finite result to all orders ... This question is well-de fined whether or not N = 8 supergravity is sensible as a full quantum theory"

So even if 4D N=8 supergravity is UV finite to all orders, it may not be sensible as a full quantum theory? Why?
 
atyy said:
So even if 4D N=8 supergravity is UV finite to all orders, it may not be sensible as a full quantum theory? Why?

http://golem.ph.utexas.edu/~distler/blog/archives/001235.html via http://motls.blogspot.com/2008/04/n8-supergravity-lance-dixons-puzzle.html " In other words, like it or not, the full quantum-mechanical theory of N=8 supergravity is M-theory, compactified on T 7, whether we put that in from the outset or not."

http://arxiv.org/abs/1005.2703
Ultraviolet Behavior of N=8 Supergravity
Lance J. Dixon

"Suppose that N = 8 supergravity is finite to all loop orders. This still would not prove that it is a nonperturbatively consistent theory of quantum gravity. There are at least two reasons to think that it might need a nonperturbative ultraviolet completion:

1. The (likely) L! or worse growth of the coefficients of the order L terms in the perturbative expansion, which for fixed-angle scattering, means a non-convergent behavior ~ L! (s/M2)L.

2. The fact that the perturbative series seems to be E7(7) invariant, while the mass spectrum of black holes is non-invariant (see e.g. ref. [88] for recent discussions)."
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am surprised by the hype regarding "perturbative finiteness" of D=4, N=8 SUGRA
- as said perturbative finiteness order by order does not mean that the perturbation series itself is finite
- the theory is phenomenologically not viable

So what are the reasons to study this theory?
 
Last edited:
tom.stoer said:
I am surprised by the hype regarding "perturbative finiteness" of D=4, N=8 SUGRA
- as said perturbative finiteness order by order does not mean that the perturbation series itself is finite
- the theory is phenomenologically not viable
So what are the reasons to study this theory?

There are plenty of theoretical reasons, besides those related to string theory. The primary and obvious one being that this is the only known example of a nontrivial quantum field theory that is both pertubatively finite and contains gravity in 4 dimensions. It is not a realistic model in terms of particle and matter content, but it is a consistent theory and a very close cousin to the real thing in most respects.

And its a very nice cousin at that, b/c you are allowed to ask a lot of questions, and here you can actually calculate a lot of answers (even nonperturbatively)

Aside from that, it is an aesthetically beautiful theory and there is a lot of deep mathematics hiding in its structure.

The modern interest lies in the application of the KLT relations and the strange but nontrivial relation with N=4 SYM
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
11K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
16K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K