Could our solar system exist 100x bigger?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion explores the hypothetical scenario of a solar system scaled up by a factor of 100, including a supergiant star and proportionally larger planets. Participants examine the implications of such scaling on stability, mass, and the feasibility of life forms within this enlarged system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes the idea of a solar system 100 times larger, questioning its possibility and likelihood of existence.
  • Another participant argues that such an increase in size and mass would lead to profound effects on the star and planets, including a significantly reduced lifespan for the sun and instability for the planets.
  • Concerns are raised about the scaling effects on gravity and structural integrity, with one participant noting that a 100-times-scaled Earth would experience extreme gravitational forces and core pressures, leading to catastrophic outcomes.
  • Participants discuss the complexities of scaling, emphasizing that not all properties scale linearly and that adjustments in distances and other factors are necessary.
  • One participant highlights that a 100-times-scaled Jupiter would not only become a star but would also exceed the limits of stellar formation, potentially resulting in a supernova-like explosion.
  • Another participant suggests that small fractional increases in size might be more feasible for maintaining stability within the solar system.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the feasibility of a 100-times larger solar system, with some arguing against its possibility due to physical constraints while others speculate on the potential for smaller scaling. The discussion remains unresolved with multiple competing views on the implications of such scaling.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that scaling affects various physical properties differently, such as volume and gravitational attraction, which complicates the idea of simply increasing size uniformly. The discussion also highlights the extreme conditions that would arise from such scaling, which are not fully resolved.

louisbaron
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Imagine somewhere far within the solar system there was an exact copy of our solar system (Proportional). But the overall proportion was increased by 100. Imagine a supergiant star/sun with a proportional planets to that of our solar system. So in theory the people would look like giants in relation to our body size. My question is would this be possible? And is it likely for this to exist within the solar system.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
No, this is not possible. The increased size and mass have profound effects on the star and planets. For one, the Sun would be so massive that it would only survive a few million years instead of the roughly 8-10 billion years it will last now. Also, the planets simply cannot grow to 100x their current size and retain a similar makeup. A rocky planet 100x the size of the Earth would be larger and more massive than Jupiter (if by size you mean diameter). Jupiter would gain so much mass that it would become a star larger and more massive than the Sun.

It's also not possible that "giants" exist 100x larger than humans due to scaling issues. See the following articles:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Square-cube_law#Biomechanics
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allometry
 
So I could assume small fractional increases in overall size could be acceptable for the solar system to be stable?
 
louisbaron said:
So I could assume small fractional increases in overall size could be acceptable for the solar system to be stable?

Possibly, but the problem you run into on these "scaling up/down" things that some people just don't seem to think through is that some things act based on a CUBE (the volume/mass of a sphere for example) and some on a SQUARE (the gravitational attraction based on distance). Scaling is thus not as trivial as just changing everything's size, you also have to adjust distances but not by the same scale factor.
 
100-times-scaled planets would be problematic. Earth, for example, would have 3 solar masses and, before its inevitable collapse into a white dwarf or neutron star or some other mysterious very dense object occurred, have 100 G of gravity on its surface. a 100-times-scaled human wouldn't be able to survive lying down sleeping in 1 G, let alone standing up and walking around in 100.

The core pressure of Earth would be something like 3.5 Petapascals initially. That is far too high for any kind of matter to avoid compressing, which would further increase the gravity, further increasing the pressure, etc, until something exploded and the remains collapsed.

Jupiter would not only be a star, it would be too massive to be a star, at a density like that, Jupiter would collapse until fusion occurred at the center, then violently explode as a chain reaction caused the 1000-solar-mass monster to blow off its outer layers in a supernova-like fashion.

A 100-times-scale sun would tend to either collapse or explode, although it might be possible that it would form a black hole star or some other immensely massive and exotic object.

Naively, a star that massive would be a bomb. It would be presumed to have a lifespan of about 5 minutes and 15 seconds. Of course, the speed of light would restrict that, but you get the idea. Even the 100x Jupiter would have a lifespan of only 316 years.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 122 ·
5
Replies
122
Views
9K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K