Could someone explain Luders Rule?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TimH
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Explain
Click For Summary
Lüder's Rule is a principle in quantum mechanics that addresses how a density matrix changes after a measurement is made, particularly in non-Boolean logic scenarios involving incompatible observables. It provides a framework for understanding conditional probabilities in quantum systems, which are often mixtures of states represented by a density matrix. The rule emphasizes that the resulting state after measurement is not simply the projection onto an eigenstate, as multiple states can contribute to the outcome. This concept is particularly useful in explaining the causal anomalies observed in quantum mechanics, such as those illustrated by the two-slit experiment and the EPR paradox. Understanding Lüder's Rule in practical terms enhances comprehension of quantum measurement processes.
TimH
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
I'm reading The Structure and Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics by Hughes. He has a chapter where he develops an account of conditional probability in QM which he uses to explain the two-slit experiment and the EPR (singlet state) situation. Basically the idea is that this conditional probability function allows for talk of conditional probability in situations where the logic in non-Boolean (i.e. incompatible observables). Conditional probability is the probability of event A given that event B occurs. The rule he gives is in terms of density operators in Hilbert space and he refers to it as Luders rule (with umlauts over the u).

Anyway he argues that the rule has many very useful consequences in terms of explaining the "causal anomalies" of QM. I would really like to understand what this rule is really saying in practical terms (i.e. not just the math). Any help appreciated. Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let's say you have a system which is comprised of a mixture of states. The way you describe this system is via a density matrix, which tells you how much of each state you have in the total system.

Now, if you measure some observable S, as a result, you will have one of the eigenstates si of the operator S, right? The Lüder's rule is telling you how the density matrix changes after this measurement. This matrix is not simply |si><si| as one might expect because the states building up the total system before the measurement need not be orthogonal, so more than one state can contribute to the result si.
 
Necropost alert!

This thread is more than nine years old. According to his profile (click on his username), TimH was last "seen" here six years ago.
 
jtbell said:
Necropost alert!

This thread is more than nine years old. According to his profile (click on his username), TimH was last "seen" here six years ago.
Maybe he will wake up frozen in the arctic circle in 70 years and return to PF!
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 89 ·
3
Replies
89
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K