News Could Splitting Votes Lead to a More Accurate Election Outcome?

  • Thread starter Thread starter causalset
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Voting
Click For Summary
The proposed voting system allows individuals to split their single vote among multiple candidates, which could lead to a more accurate representation of voter preferences. This method aims to address issues where similar candidates split the vote, potentially allowing less favored candidates to win. Supporters argue that it provides a strategic advantage, enabling voters to support multiple candidates they favor while minimizing the risk of an undesired candidate winning. Critics question the added complexity and whether it truly resolves the problems of the current voting system, suggesting that it may not change the overall election outcomes. The discussion highlights the ongoing debate about the effectiveness of traditional voting methods versus innovative approaches.
  • #31
The statement of Arrow's theorem is: if blah blah blah about voting systems, then there is a dictator. People gasp. Oh my god, a dictator! They scream. But the system I described has a dictator, and nobody thinks that's a terrible thing.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Office_Shredder said:
The statement of Arrow's theorem is: if blah blah blah about voting systems, then there is a dictator. People gasp. Oh my god, a dictator! They scream. But the system I described has a dictator, and nobody thinks that's a terrible thing.
I think the terrible thing about this is your understanding of Arrow's theorem!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
14K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 139 ·
5
Replies
139
Views
16K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K