I Could the Universe's Early State Be a Superposition of High and Low Entropy?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Adrian Lee
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a preprint article titled “time’s arrow points to many worlds,” which proposes that the early universe may exist as a superposition of high and low entropy states, challenging the traditional "past hypothesis" that suggests a low entropy beginning. The author argues that observed thermodynamic time could be explained through anthropological terms of quantum many worlds, potentially supporting the existence of multiple universes. Participants express frustration over the inability to access the preprint and emphasize the importance of providing references to facilitate discussion. The conversation highlights the need for credible sources to explore the implications of the past hypothesis further. Overall, the topic raises significant questions about the nature of the universe's early state and its entropy.
Adrian Lee
Messages
35
Reaction score
10
Today I came over an article(preprint)named “time’s arrow points to many worlds”,by a Chinese researcher (who is a supporter of collapse theories himself?)
He introduced the”past hypothesis “,which is the hypothesis that the universe started as a low entropy state.(See Hawking,Wallace and others).He thinks that this isn’t necessary and he instead thinks it is possible that the early universe could be a superposition of a high entropy state and a low entropy state.In this case, the observed thermal dynamical time can only be explained by anthropological terms of quantum many worlds.
In his other article he cited this paper and “moreover,the observed thermaldynamical time may be a strong evidence of the existence of many worlds.”
I’d like to know more about the hypothesis and the significance of his claims?
 
Last edited:
Space news on Phys.org
Adrian Lee said:
Today I came over an article(preprint)named “time’s arrow points to many worlds”,by a Chinese researcher (who is a supporter of collapse theories himself?)
What article? Please give a link.
 
PeterDonis said:
What article? Please give a link.
It’s preprint,so I can’t give it.In order not to be banned I just gave the main idea,and my main question is about the past hypothesis.(the article itself is very short within pages.)
 
Adrian Lee said:
It’s preprint,so I can’t give it.
Huh? Preprints are routinely published on arxiv.org.

If you can't give it, we can't talk about it.

Thread closed.
 
  • Like
Likes Vanadium 50
Adrian Lee said:
my main question is about the past hypothesis
Then you need to find a reference you can give about the past hypothesis, and ask your question based on what that reference says. Since you mentioned Hawking, Wallace and others, you should have no trouble finding a valid reference.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...
Back
Top