Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Couldn't understand the proof for Method of variation of parameters

  1. Oct 24, 2012 #1
    Here's the proof that I read for method of variation of parameters-


    What I couldn't understand is that how could one simply assume that

    u'1y1+u2'y2=0 and

    I just don't understand from where you get those above two results.
    I would be really happy if could clear my doubt.

    Thanks a lot for physics forum and its members. You have helped me a lot :)

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 24, 2012 #2
    In a nutshell, you assume that the first equation is true. That assumption is part of the technique. Once you assume that the first equation is true, you plug u1y1+u2y2 into your original differential equation and you end up with the second equation.

    Think of it this way, you have two unknowns (u1, and u2). But your original differential equation is only one equation. So we just set u1'y1+u2'y2=0 so that we have two equations for two unknowns.

    With that said, a second order ODE can be converted into a first order system of ODE for two unknown functions. If you do variation of parameters on THAT system, then you get the same two equations without having to make up one of them out of thin air. So in that sense, the first equation is not really just an arbitrary choice that makes it easy to solve for u1 and u2. It can be derived from something that comes from a later topic in your course.
  4. Oct 24, 2012 #3
    I did what you said. I assumed the first one and tried to plug that into the first equation which is


    but I couldn't get the second equation.

    Here's my derivation-


    as we have assumed that u'1y1+u'2y2=0


    and if we plug in these expressions for y,y',y'' in the equation


    I don't get the second equation. I mean there are many terms apart from

    and how did you neglect them?

    Thanks a lot :)
  5. Oct 24, 2012 #4
    Those terms cancel each other out. You have to use the fact that y1 and y2 each satisfy the homogeneous equation.
    y1''+py1'+qy1=0, and the same for y2.
  6. Oct 24, 2012 #5
    Got it.

    Thanks :)
Share this great discussion with others via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook