Coulomb's epsilon zero and its name

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter DaTario
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Epsilon Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the term "epsilon zero," also known as the permittivity constant, in the context of Coulomb's law. Participants argue that the name is misleading, as an increase in epsilon zero does not correlate with an increased ability for charges to "see" each other, contrary to what the term "permitivity" suggests. Instead, epsilon zero represents the ratio of charge enclosed by a surface to the electric flux through that surface. The term is deemed archaic but has practical relevance in engineering applications, particularly in capacitor design.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's law and electric forces
  • Familiarity with the concept of electric flux
  • Basic knowledge of capacitors and their function
  • Awareness of the historical context of scientific terminology
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mathematical formulation of Coulomb's law and its implications
  • Study the role of permittivity in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the design and function of capacitors in electrical circuits
  • Investigate the historical evolution of scientific terminology in physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, electrical engineers, and students studying electromagnetism who seek to deepen their understanding of the permittivity constant and its applications in engineering contexts.

DaTario
Messages
1,097
Reaction score
46
In Coulomb's law the term epsilon zero appears in the denominator and receives the name of permittivity constant [\b]. As it comes from the word permit (allow) then it would seem reasonable, for me at least, to expect that, as epsilon zero increases, the vacuum would be allowing one charge to better "see" the other, and then the force would be greater. But it is the opposite.

Is this name justifiable in some acceptation of this word ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Epsilon zero is the ratio between the charge enclosed by a surface and the electric flux through that surface. The name "permitivity of vacuum" is archaic and pointless.
 
But consider a space full of smoke. If the force had to do with seeing the other, this part played by the space has some sense in permiting the force to cross the space in between.

I would like seeing epsilon zero in the numerator so as to call it permitivity.
 
A large value of epsilon "permits" lots of charge
to build up, with fairly small Voltage.

It's archaic, and inverse to the physicists' viepoint
which usually emphasizes the fields,
but is reasonable for engineering purposes (as in capacitors).
 
I am satisfied with this answer. The capacitor view point is quite understandable.

Best Regards,

DaTario
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
32
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
50K