Covariance matrix of 2 matrices?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the covariance matrix of an (m × n) complex matrix, denoted as N, whose elements are zero-mean random variables. The expression \mathcal{E}\left\{\textbf{N}\textbf{N}^H\right\} = \textbf{I} indicates that the covariance matrix is the identity matrix, suggesting that the elements of N are uncorrelated and have unit variance. However, the complexity increases as the covariance of an NxN matrix is described as a NxNxNxN Cartesian tensor, complicating direct deductions similar to those made for an (m × 1) vector.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with covariance matrices and statistical expectations
  • Knowledge of linear algebra concepts, particularly matrix operations
  • Basic understanding of random variables and their distributions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of covariance matrices in multivariate statistics
  • Learn about Cartesian tensors and their applications in statistics
  • Explore the implications of zero-mean random variables in matrix theory
  • Investigate the relationship between covariance matrices and multivariate normal distributions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, statisticians, data scientists, and anyone involved in advanced statistical analysis or linear algebra applications will benefit from this discussion.

weetabixharry
Messages
111
Reaction score
0
I have an (m \times n) complex matrix, \textbf{N}, whose elements are zero-mean random variables. I have a sort of covariance expression:

\mathcal{E}\left\{\textbf{N}\textbf{N}^H\right\} = \textbf{I}

where \mathcal{E}\left\{\right\} denotes expectation, \{\}^H is conjugate transpose and \textbf{I} is the identity matrix.

Basically, I want to know exactly what this tells me about the second order statistics of the elements of \textbf{N}. For example, I know that if instead I just had an (m \times 1) vector, \textbf{n}, then an identity covariance matrix would imply that all the elements of \textbf{n} have unit variance and are uncorrelated.

Can I make any similar deductions from the matrix equation, above? Many thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
weetabixharry said:
I have an (m \times n) complex matrix, \textbf{N}, whose elements are zero-mean random variables. I have a sort of covariance expression:

\mathcal{E}\left\{\textbf{N}\textbf{N}^H\right\} = \textbf{I}

where \mathcal{E}\left\{\right\} denotes expectation, \{\}^H is conjugate transpose and \textbf{I} is the identity matrix.

Basically, I want to know exactly what this tells me about the second order statistics of the elements of \textbf{N}. For example, I know that if instead I just had an (m \times 1) vector, \textbf{n}, then an identity covariance matrix would imply that all the elements of \textbf{n} have unit variance and are uncorrelated.

Can I make any similar deductions from the matrix equation, above? Many thanks for any help!

Hey weetabixharry.

To me an identity covariance matrix says that there is no covariance terms at all for the different permutations, but I would want to see the expanded definitions for each random variable just to be absolutely sure.

I'm not familiar with your matrix identity though, so I would need to put that into context of standard results concerning expanded definitions of the associated random variables.
 
weetabixharry said:
Can I make any similar deductions from the matrix equation, above? Many thanks for any help!
No.

The covariance of an NxN matrix is a NxNxNxN cartesian tensor; a very ugly beast. Your NxN matrix is the equivalent of the diagonal of a covariance matrix for a Nx1 vector.
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K