CP violation and allowed interactions

Click For Summary
CP violation occurs when complex couplings are involved, leading to potential restrictions on certain interactions. The interaction AHH is forbidden under CP conservation, while the status of HAA remains unclear and requires further clarification. The discussion also touches on the absence of a coupling like ZAA due to the requirement for opposite parity between Higgs bosons under CP invariance. Additionally, the potential coupling of a colored scalar S to gluons raises questions about CP invariance or violation in strong interactions, which is less understood compared to electroweak interactions. Overall, the complexities of CP violation and its implications for various interactions are central to the inquiry.
Safinaz
Messages
255
Reaction score
8
Hi,

My question about CP- violation, but it has many parts, so I appreciate any help about..

First: I know that, any complex coupling leads to CP - violation, so if for example A is a complex scalar, and H is a real scalar, interaction as: A HH will be forbidden if we considered CP conservation, but what about H A A, will it be allowed ?

Second: I read that ## ^{(1)} ## there is no coupling as : Z A A, because CP–invariance im-
plies that the two Higgs bosons must have an opposite parity. I don't understand why cp -invariance implies that ?

And what about a coupling to a gluon as: G S S ( consider S is a coloured cp- odd or cp- even scalar), will it be allowed ? I mean is there in the strong interactions CP - invariance or violation (since CP- violation observed only in the EW interactions )

Bests,
s

(1) " arXiv:hep-ph/0503173v2 ", Sec. 1.2.3,
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi!

Before trying to answer (I am also not an expert but I am trying to learn this stuff my self), I am confused by your question.

You say that any complex coupling generates CP violation. What do you mean? A complex coupling constant, say 'g'? Or a vertex which contains a complex field? The you say that AHH would be forbidden for this reason (because there is one complex field?), and you ask whether HAA would be forbidden. You mean HA*A I guess...

Second, you say " Z A A, because CP–invariance implies that the two Higgs bosons must have an opposite parity"

Where is the Higgs boson here? Are you assuming a CP odd Higgs boson?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K