MHB Cp2.63 find the initial velocity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers around calculating the initial velocity of a particle given its acceleration function, defined as $$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3$$. Participants emphasize the importance of recognizing that acceleration is the derivative of velocity and that the terms in the acceleration function must be consistent in their units. The discussion concludes that the second term likely requires a time factor to maintain dimensional consistency, suggesting a revised acceleration function of $$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3 \cdot t$$.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically integration and differentiation.
  • Familiarity with kinematic equations in physics.
  • Knowledge of dimensional analysis to ensure unit consistency.
  • Ability to interpret and manipulate mathematical expressions involving derivatives and integrals.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of acceleration as the derivative of velocity in kinematics.
  • Learn how to perform integration to find velocity from acceleration functions.
  • Explore dimensional analysis techniques to verify the consistency of physical equations.
  • Investigate the graphical representation of polynomial functions to visualize motion.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, educators teaching kinematics, and anyone interested in understanding motion through calculus.

karush
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,240
Reaction score
5
cp2.63. The acceleration of a particle is given by
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3.$$
a. find the initial velocity $v_0$ such that the particle will have the same x-coordinate at $t=4.00\, s$ as it had at $t=0$.
b. What will be the velocity at $t=4.00 s$

ok sorry but I don't even know step one...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
karush said:
cp2.63. The acceleration of a particle is given by
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3.$$
a. find the initial velocity $v_0$ such that the particle will have the same x-coordinate at $t=4.00\, s$ as it had at $t=0$.
b. What will be the velocity at $t=4.00 s$

ok sorry but I don't even know step one...
Well, start from the beginning:
[math]v(t) - v(0) = \int_0^t a(t') ~ dt'[/math]

[math]x(t) - x(0) = \int_0^t v(t') ~ dt'[/math]

Once you get that then go ahead and set x(0) = x(4) and see what you need to have for v(0).

-Dan
 
I would think that "step one" would be to recognize that "-2.0 m/s2+ 3.0 m/s2" is just 1.0 m/s2! Then use, as Topsquark suggests, that velocity is the "anti-derivative" of acceleration and distance moved is the "anti-derivative" of velocity.
 
HallsofIvy said:
I would think that "step one" would be to recognize that "-2.0 m/s2+ 3.0 m/s2" is just 1.0 m/s2! Then use, as Topsquark suggests, that velocity is the "anti-derivative" of acceleration and distance moved is the "anti-derivative" of velocity.
so would it be this?
$\displaystyle \int_0^t v(t') ~ dt' =\int_0^4 t\, dt $
 
karush said:
cp2.63. The acceleration of a particle is given by
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3.$$
a. find the initial velocity $v_0$ such that the particle will have the same x-coordinate at $t=4.00\, s$ as it had at $t=0$.
b. What will be the velocity at $t=4.00 s$

ok sorry but I don't even know step one...

HallsofIvy said:
I would think that "step one" would be to recognize that "-2.0 m/s2+ 3.0 m/s2" is just 1.0 m/s2! Then use, as Topsquark suggests, that velocity is the "anti-derivative" of acceleration and distance moved is the "anti-derivative" of velocity.
Okay, I have to ask this, then, before we go further. Is the acceleration -2.00 m/s^2 + 3.00 m/s^3 or -2.00 m/s^2 + 3.00 m/s^2 ?

-Dan
 
ok let's drop this post there might be a typo in this..
 
I think the velocity is *actually* non-linear. I expect that there is a jerk in the progression of cause to effect. Likely the time is missing in the second term. With a time factor the particle will wibble and wobble.
The unit of the second term is $\text{m}/\text{s}^3$ after all.
 
Klaas van Aarsen said:
I think the velocity is *actually* non-linear. I expect that there is a jerk in the progression of cause to effect. Likely the time is missing in the second term. With a time factor the particle will wibble and wobble.
The unit of the second term is $\text{m}/\text{s}^3$ after all.

yes the OP equation is correct I looked up in the book

however not real sure how a plot of this would look like would
$y=-2x^2+3x^3$ on desmos give us the graph?

[DESMOS]advanced: {"version":7,"graph":{"showGrid":false,"xAxisStep":1,"squareAxes":false,"viewport":{"xmin":-1.481,"ymin":-1.718,"xmax":12,"ymax":1000}},"expressions":{"list":[{"type":"expression","id":"graph1","color":"#2d70b3","latex":"y=-2x^2+3x^3\\ \\left\\{0\\le x\\le6\\right\\}"}]}}[/DESMOS]
 
Last edited:
karush said:
yes the OP equation is correct I looked up in the book

It cannot be correct.
It says:
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, \text{m}/\text{s}^2 +3.00 \, \text{m}/\text{s}^3$$
But we cannot add $\text{m}/\text{s}^2$ to $\text{m}/\text{s}^3$.
It does not make sense to split the terms like that either.

Likely it should be:
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3\cdot t$$
 
  • #10
ok let's work with that
its basically a learning problem anyway

so is the reason you do not have t in the first term is bc that is the acceleration at t=0
 
  • #11
Klaas van Aarsen said:
It cannot be correct.
It says:
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, \text{m}/\text{s}^2 +3.00 \, \text{m}/\text{s}^3$$
But we cannot add $\text{m}/\text{s}^2$ to $\text{m}/\text{s}^3$.
It does not make sense to split the terms like that either.

Likely it should be:
$$a(t)=-2.00 \, m/s^2 +3.00 \, m/s^3\cdot t$$
Unless the "3" carries units of distance. I've seen this "unit drop" often when moving Physics concepts to Mathematics.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K