I CQED understanding superconducting qbits circuits

Click For Summary
Circuit quantum electrodynamics (CQED) involves the study of superconducting qubits and their implementation through lumped circuit diagrams, which reveal interesting correspondences between classical and quantum models. Understanding how qu-circuits are built and modeled requires knowledge of their physical components, including micro transmission lines and resonators, where both shape and length can influence performance. The design process for CQED circuits parallels that of conventional microwave circuits, utilizing lumped element versions before transitioning to microwave implementations. Resources such as the 2020 review article, Blais et al.'s original paper from 2004, and the Qiskit YouTube channel provide valuable insights into this field. Engaging with experts in academia or industry is also recommended for deeper exploration of quantum engineering.
maajdl
Gold Member
Messages
391
Reaction score
29
TL;DR
modeling qbit circuit
I have read a little about cqed, "circuit quantum electrodynamics".
I would be interested in references to dig a qbit deeper in this topic!

I have seen lumped circuit diagrams for superconducting qbits.
The correspondance between classical and quantum models for these circuits is really interresting.
I have seen physical diagrams for how q-circuits are actually implemented.
The correspondance between these diagrams is not so obvious.

I would like to know more about how q-circuits are actually built
and how they could then be modeled or simulated or understood as lumped q-circuits.
I would especially like to understand in detail how the coupling works for setting the state or for reading the state.
For example, I have seen that micro transmission lines (resonators) are involved and I would like to know the principles of their physical modelling.
For example: do their shape matter or does only their length matter?

I guess it is essentially based on a classical model that is later quantified.
So in a sense, it is the classical models of these cicruits that matter first for my understanding.

Any references welcome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I find a review in 2020 by web search
https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031119-050605
I hope you would find one of your taste in the web. If you need more detailed information I recommend you to go to referred papers or contact university or company experts. They would welcome ambitious young people to join the quantum engineering forces.
 
Last edited:
The "original" circuit QED paper by Blais et al from 2004 is still a good reference.
There are lots of review articles (most available on the arXiv) including a recent one from some of the people who did the initial work
https://arxiv.org/abs/2005.12667

Another good resource is the Qiskit YouTube channel (Qiskit is IBM's quantum software framework) as well as the documentation for Qiskit Metal (which is a free design software for CQED circuits, although you also need a HFSS license to get the most out of it)

About your second question: CQED circuits are in terms of their EM behaviour really just "normal" microwave circuits albeit made using (mainly) superconducting conductors plus some non-linear elements (Josephson junctions).
Hence, the design flow is very similar to what one would typically use for any other MW circuit (say a telecom filter) : You usually would start by a lumped element version of the circuit you need and then you would start designing MW versions of each element: an LC resonator might be implemented as a quarter wavelength resonator, an inductor as a squiggly line etc
All of this design work is mainly done using conventional microwave software. Although increasingly some of the modelling and design is now done using specialised packages such as the aforementioned Qiskit Metal
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes maajdl and vanhees71
For the quantum state ##|l,m\rangle= |2,0\rangle## the z-component of angular momentum is zero and ##|L^2|=6 \hbar^2##. According to uncertainty it is impossible to determine the values of ##L_x, L_y, L_z## simultaneously. However, we know that ##L_x## and ## L_y##, like ##L_z##, get the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. In other words, for the state ##|2,0\rangle## we have ##\vec{L}=(L_x, L_y,0)## with ##L_x## and ## L_y## one of the values ##(-2,-1,0,1,2) \hbar##. But none of these...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
923
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
973