MHB Crazy Circle Illusion: Amaze Your Friends!

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Friends
AI Thread Summary
The Crazy Circle Illusion involves a fascinating visual trick where an inner circle rolls inside an outer circle, creating an optical illusion. The discussion explains the mathematical principles behind this effect, particularly how the inner circle's radius is half that of the outer circle. As the inner circle rolls, a point on its circumference moves in a clockwise direction, while the center of the inner circle shifts counter-clockwise. The resulting path traced by the point creates a straight line segment, illustrating the periodic nature of the motion. This concept has inspired various animations and coding challenges, showcasing the creativity and complexity of visual illusions.
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Surely this must be tricks of the eye? Anyone up for calculating the real path traversed by the vertices of an octagon when in such a motion?
 
mathbalarka said:
Surely this must be tricks of the eye? Anyone up for calculating the real path traversed by the vertices of an octagon when in such a motion?

You can draw a circle with a cosine horizontally and a sine vertically.
This is how a cosine and a sine are defined on the unit circle.
It makes sense that if you create a whole bunch of sines on straight lines with the proper phase differences, that you'd get a circle.
 
Mesmerizing! :D

I have embedded the video so people can just watch it here.
 
I think the "trick" to this is that the "inner circle" (polygon) has exactly half the radius of the outer circle.

Imagine we trace the path of a point on a circle of radius $r$ as it travels inside a circle of radius $2r$. Since it doesn't really matter "when" we start tracking it (the path is periodic), assume that both circles are touching at the point $(0,2r)$ at $t = 0$, and that the outer circle is centered at the origin.

As the inner circle "rolls" counter-clockwise, the point on the inner circle we are tracking moves CLOCKWISE around a shifting center.

This center is at: $((2r-r)\cos t,(2r-r)\sin t) = (r\cos t,r\sin t)$. Since the outer circle's circumference (which is directly proportional to radius) is twice that of the inner circle, as the center has moved through an angle of $t$, the point we are tracking makes an angle of $2t$ with the point of tangency. Half of this angle is $t$, the other half is the angle our tracked point makes to a horizontal line passing through the center of the inner circle.

It follows our tracked point has coordinates:

$(r\cos(-t),r\sin(-t)) + (r\cos t,r\sin t) = (2r\cos t,0)$.

As $t$ varies, the image $\{(x(t),y(t)): t \in \Bbb R_0^+\}$ is the interval $[-2r,2r]\times \{0\}$, which is a "straight-line" (segment).
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top