Creation and annihilation operators

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equation (a^\dagger a)^2 = a^\dagger a^\dagger a a + a^\dagger a, using the definitions of the creation and annihilation operators. The original poster struggles with the calculations, particularly when attempting to square the term a^\dagger a and relates it to the identity matrix. There is confusion regarding notation, specifically the use of superscripts and the relationship between aa^\dagger and a^\dagger a. Participants suggest expressing one operator in terms of the other to simplify the problem. The conversation highlights the challenges in manipulating these operators and the need for clarity in mathematical notation.
Lindsayyyy
Messages
215
Reaction score
0
Hi all

Homework Statement


Show:

(a^\dagger a)^2=a^\dagger a^\dagger a a +a^\dagger a

wheres:
a= \lambda x +i \gamma p
a^\dagger= \lambda x -i \gamma p

Homework Equations


-

The Attempt at a Solution



Well, I haven't got much.

I just tried to use the stuff given, put it into my equation and solve it, but I don't get to the right side.

I calculated a+a first

a^\dagger a ={\lambda}^2x^2 + \frac {1}{2} I + \gamma^2 p^2

But when I now try to calculate the square of that term I get lost. If I square it I get to:

(a^\dagger a)^2= \lambda^4x^4+\gamma^4p^4 +\lambda^2 \gamma^2 (x^2p^2+p^2x^2)-\lambda^2 x^2 -\gamma^2 p^2 +\frac 1 4 ICan anyone help me with this? I don't know what to do now/ If I'm on the right way.

Thanks for your help

edit: I is the identity matrix
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a^{+}a)^{2}
= a^{=}aa^{+}a
=a^{+}(aa^{+})a.

Now try to get aa^{+} in terms of a^{+}a.
 
grzz said:
(a^{+}a)^{2}
= a^{=}aa^{+}a
=a^{+}(aa^{+})a.

Now try to get aa^{+} in terms of a^{+}a.

what does your a^= mean? I don't know this sign.

Thanks for your help

edit:

aa^\dagger=\lambda^2 x^2 + \frac 1 2 I +\gamma^2 p^2
 
I used the plus sign instead of the dagger sign.

You are supposed to see a with + as a superscript wherever you see a with ^ as a superscript.

Sorry for the trouble in the notation used.
 
I see a = not a + but I think it's just a typing mistake.

so what you mean

...= a^\dagger a a^\dagger a=a^\dagger (aa^\dagger) a

is that what you meant?

I calculated my aa+ (see my post) and a+a is the same, though there's a minus infront of the I
 
Lindsayyyy said:
I calculated my aa+ (see my post) and a+a is the same, though there's a minus infront of the I
"The same"? That difference in sign makes all the difference. Can you now relate aa^{\dagger} to a^{\dagger}a?
 
With "the same" I meant the rest of the terms. Unlucky word choice from my side I guess.
What do you mean with "can you now relate aa+ to a+a"
do you mean that I should calculate (aa^\dagger) (a^\dagger a)

thanks for the help
 
No, I meant the relationship between aa^{\dagger} and a^{\dagger}a ie express one of them in terms of the other.
 
Yes that is what I meant.

Allow me to use a+ to mean a with + as a superscript.

So aa+ = a+a + 1.

Now one more step.
 
  • #10
Do you mean something like

a^\dagger a = 2\lambda^2 x^2 +2 \gamma^2 x^2 -a a^\dagger

edit: nevermind, fail lol.

I guess you meant what grzz just said. I have to eat dinner now. I'll try later or tomorrow and come back when I have further questions (I'm pretty sure I will have some :( )

Thanks so far for the help guys.
 

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K