Cross and dot product of two vectors in non-orthogonal coordinate

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the computation of the cross and dot products of two vectors in a non-orthogonal coordinate system. Participants explore the implications of non-orthogonality on these vector operations, addressing both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests using the definitions of dot and cross products based on angles between vectors, asserting that these operations are independent of the coordinate system.
  • Another participant challenges this view by presenting a specific example of a non-orthogonal coordinate system, arguing that the cross product does not yield a vector perpendicular to both original vectors in such a system.
  • A later reply elaborates on calculating the dot product by expanding vectors in terms of contravariant components and provides a specific example of defining a non-orthogonal coordinate system with relations between Cartesian coordinates.
  • This participant also discusses deriving the non-orthogonal basis vectors and computing the metric tensor, suggesting a method for general dot product calculations in non-orthogonal systems.
  • For the cross product, the participant proposes a similar approach using the orthonormal basis definition and the Levi-Civita symbol, indicating that the formulation may differ in non-orthogonal systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express disagreement regarding the independence of the dot and cross products from the coordinate system. Multiple competing views remain on how to approach these calculations in non-orthogonal coordinates.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the specific assumptions made about the coordinate transformations and the dependence on the definitions of the basis vectors and metric tensor in non-orthogonal systems.

anurag
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
I have to find out how to do cross and dot product for two vectors in non-orthogonal coordinate system.
thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could always use the [itex]\vec{u}\cdot\vec{v}=|\vec{u}|\ |\vec{v}|\cos\theta[/itex] and [itex]\vec{u}\times\vec{v}=|\vec{u}|\ |\vec{v}|\sin\theta \ \hat{n}[/itex] definitions. In general the dot and cross product are independent of coordinate system.
 
Dear jk86,
I don't think so. Consider a non-orthogonal coordinate system like in which angle between any two axis in less than 90 degree. and two vector along x and y-axis [1 0 0] & [0 1 0], then the normal cross product is [0 0 1] which is along z-direction but for this coordinate system, z is not perpendicular to x and y axis. and you know cross product of two vector should be perpendicular to both vector.
 
anurag said:
Dear jk86,
I don't think so. Consider a non-orthogonal coordinate system like in which angle between any two axis in less than 90 degree. and two vector along x and y-axis [1 0 0] & [0 1 0], then the normal cross product is [0 0 1] which is along z-direction but for this coordinate system, z is not perpendicular to x and y axis. and you know cross product of two vector should be perpendicular to both vector.

Ah, OK I'm sorry I should have read your post more carefully. If you are calculating the dot product of [itex]\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}[/itex], you can expand each in terms of its contravariant components. As an example, define a coordinate system (u,v,w) via the Cartesian coordinates (x,y,z) using some relations:
[tex] \begin{align}<br /> x &= u + v\\<br /> y &= u - v\\<br /> z &= 3uv + 2w<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
If the basis vectors for the non-orthogonal (u,v,w) coordinate system are [itex]\vec{e}_u,\vec{e}_v,\vec{e}_{w}[/itex] (and they are [itex]\hat{e}_x,\hat{e}_y,\hat{e}_z[/itex] for the Cartesian basis) then you can write a general vector [itex]\vec{r}=x\hat{e}_x + y\hat{e}_y+z\hat{e}_z=(u+v)\hat{e}_x + (u-v)\hat{e}_y + (3uv + 2w)\hat{e}_z[/itex]. You can then find the non-orthogonal basis vectors by:
[tex] \begin{align}<br /> \vec{e}_u &= \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial u} = \hat{e}_x + \hat{e}_y + 3v\hat{e}_z\\<br /> \vec{e}_v &= \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial u} = \hat{e}_x - \hat{e}_y + 3u\hat{e}_z\\<br /> \vec{e}_w &= \frac{\partial \vec{r}}{\partial u} = 2\hat{e}_z<br /> \end{align}[/tex]
You can verify that the example is indeed non-orthogonal by computing dot products such as [itex]\vec{e}_u\cdot\vec{e}_w = (3v\hat{e}_z)\cdot(2\hat{e}_z)=6v[/itex]. To compute more general dot products, and make all this simpler, you should first find the metric tensor:
[tex] g_{ij}\equiv \vec{e}_i\cdot\vec{e}_j = \begin{bmatrix}2+9v^2 & 9uv & 6v\\ 9uv & 2+9u^2 & 6u\\ 6v & 6u & 4\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
where i,j refer to [itex]u,v,w[/itex] basis indices. Then for some vectors [itex]\vec{a}[/itex] and [itex]\vec{b}[/itex], you get [itex]\vec{a}\cdot\vec{b}=(\sum_i a^i\vec{e}_i)\cdot (\sum_j b^j\vec{e}_j)=\sum_{ij}g_{ij}a^ib^j[/itex]. You are then simply sticking a matrix [itex]g_{ij}[/itex] in between the vectors---a matrix which is diagonal in an orthogonal coordinate system. As for the cross product you should be able to do something similar using the orthonormal basis definition [itex][\vec{a}\times\vec{b}]_i = \epsilon_{ijk}\vec{a}^j\vec{b}^k[/itex]. I think it just becomes [itex][\vec{a}\times\vec{b}]_i = g^{ij}\epsilon_{jkl}a^{k}b^{l}[/itex], where [itex]\epsilon_{jkl}[/itex] is the Levi-Civita symbol.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K