- #1
jostpuur
- 2,116
- 19
Let [itex]\mathbb{F}[/itex] be an arbitrary field, and let [itex]a,b\in\mathbb{F}^3[/itex] be vectors of the three dimensional vector space. How do you prove that if [itex]a\times b=0[/itex], then [itex]a[/itex] and [itex]b[/itex] are linearly dependent?
Consider the following attempt at a counter example: In [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex]
[tex]
\left(\begin{array}{c}
1 \\ 4 \\ 2 \\
\end{array}\right)
\times\left(\begin{array}{c}
2 \\ 3 \\ 4 \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
10 \\ 0 \\ -5 \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
holds. Since [itex]5[/itex] is a prime number, [itex]\mathbb{Z}_5[/itex] is a field. In [itex](\mathbb{Z}_5)^3[/itex]
[tex]
\left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\
\end{array}\right)
\times \left(\begin{array}{c}
[2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 0] \\ [ 0] \\ [ 0] \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
This might look like a counter example to the claim. One might consider the possibility that perhaps the claim is true for example when [itex]\mathbb{F}[/itex] is a subfield of [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex], but not in general?
A closer look reveals that the counter example attempt does not work, because
[tex]
[ 2] \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
holds in [itex](\mathbb{Z}_5)^3[/itex]. Finding a counter example is difficult, and it seems that the claim is true after all. I only know how to prove the claim using determinants when [itex]\mathbb{F}[/itex] is a subfield of [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex].
Consider the following attempt at a counter example: In [itex]\mathbb{R}^3[/itex]
[tex]
\left(\begin{array}{c}
1 \\ 4 \\ 2 \\
\end{array}\right)
\times\left(\begin{array}{c}
2 \\ 3 \\ 4 \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
10 \\ 0 \\ -5 \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
holds. Since [itex]5[/itex] is a prime number, [itex]\mathbb{Z}_5[/itex] is a field. In [itex](\mathbb{Z}_5)^3[/itex]
[tex]
\left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\
\end{array}\right)
\times \left(\begin{array}{c}
[2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 0] \\ [ 0] \\ [ 0] \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
This might look like a counter example to the claim. One might consider the possibility that perhaps the claim is true for example when [itex]\mathbb{F}[/itex] is a subfield of [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex], but not in general?
A closer look reveals that the counter example attempt does not work, because
[tex]
[ 2] \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 1] \\ [ 4] \\ [ 2] \\
\end{array}\right)
= \left(\begin{array}{c}
[ 2] \\ [ 3] \\ [ 4] \\
\end{array}\right)
[/tex]
holds in [itex](\mathbb{Z}_5)^3[/itex]. Finding a counter example is difficult, and it seems that the claim is true after all. I only know how to prove the claim using determinants when [itex]\mathbb{F}[/itex] is a subfield of [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex].