Cross product invariant under SO(3)-matrices?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of the cross product in the context of transformations by SO(3) matrices. Participants explore the proof of the statement that the cross product is invariant under such transformations, specifically examining the relationship between the cross product of vectors and their transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant, Marin, attempts to prove that for vectors \(\vec a\) and \(\vec b\) in \(\mathbb{R}^3\), the transformation \(M(\vec a \times \vec b) = M\vec a \times M\vec b\) holds when \(M\) is in SO(3), but struggles with the proof.
  • Marin considers using the epsilon tensor and the orthogonality of \(M\) but is unsure how to incorporate these elements into the proof.
  • Another participant suggests that the preservation of orientation (i.e., \(\det(M) = 1\)) is key to the proof and hints at using the determinant in conjunction with the epsilon tensor for algebraic manipulation.
  • A third participant provides a link to a related post that may contain useful information for Marin's proof.
  • Marin expresses gratitude for the hints received and finds them helpful.
  • Another participant generalizes the discussion by stating that for any invertible \(3 \times 3\) matrix \(A\), the relationship \(A\vec a \times A\vec b = M(A)(\vec a \times \vec b)\) holds, indicating a broader application of the concept.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the proof of the original statement, and there are multiple approaches and perspectives presented regarding the invariance of the cross product under transformations by SO(3) matrices.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps in Marin's proof attempt, particularly regarding the application of the epsilon tensor and the implications of the orthogonality of \(M\). The generalization presented by the last participant introduces additional complexity that may not directly relate to the original question.

Marin
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
Hi there!I'm trying to prove the following obvious statement, but am somehow stuck :(

Let [tex]\vec a,\ \vec b\in\mathbb{R^3}[/tex] , let M be in SO(3) and x be the cross productprove: [tex]M(\vec a\times\vec b)=M\vec a\times M\vec b[/tex]I tried using the epsilon tensor, as in physics, but it doesn't really produce an opportunity, as you can convince yourself:

[tex](M\vec a\times M\vec b)_i=\varepsilon_{ijk}(M\vec a)_j(M\vec b)_k=\varepsilon_{ijk}M_{jl} a_l M_{km}b_m...[/tex]

where as usual summation is over repeated indices

Now I want to use the fact that M is orthogonal, i.e.
[tex]M_{ij}M_{jk}^t=\delta_{ik}[/tex],
and preserves the orientation of the basis but I don't know where exactly this has to come into the proof...

What I want to end up with is

[tex]...=M_{ij}\varepsilon_{jkl}a_kb_l=(M(\vec a\times\vec b))_i[/tex]

The statement seems to me obvious and can be envisioned very quickly by the right-hand-rule; I don't know why establishing it makes real problemsIf you have any idea, I'd be glad to see it :)With regards,
marin
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Marlin,

I'll give you a hint (mainly 'cause I'm too lazy to latex up the answer)
The 'preserving the orientation of the basis' bit is equivalent to saying det(M)=1
Rewrite the determinant using the epsilon tensor then a little algebraic rearrangement should get you the result.
(The formula I'm thinking of can be found http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross_product#Algebraic_properties"...)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks a lot :)

this was very helpful :)
 
More Generally
Where A is any invertable 3x3 matrix and M(A) is the matrix of the minors of A

[tex]A\vec a\times A\vec b=M(A)(\vec a\times\vec b)[/tex]

I got this result by playing with the algebra. Hope I didn't make a mistake.:rolleyes:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K