MHB Cruiser & Destroyer: Finding the Closest Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on determining the optimal direction for a destroyer to travel in order to minimize the distance to a cruiser located 12 km due west. The cruiser moves at 30 km/h in a direction 60 degrees North of East, while the destroyer travels at 15 km/h. The solution reveals that the destroyer must head at an angle of 120 degrees to achieve the closest approach, with the minimum distance calculated to be 6 km. The standard method involves calculating the squared distance as a function of time and angle, leading to critical points for optimization.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector mathematics and angles
  • Familiarity with calculus, specifically partial derivatives
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their applications in navigation
  • Basic principles of relative motion in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study vector optimization techniques in physics
  • Learn about the application of partial derivatives in real-world problems
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their use in navigation
  • Investigate the principles of relative motion and their implications in maritime scenarios
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, naval strategists, and anyone involved in navigation or optimization problems in dynamic environments.

markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a cruiser is 12 km due west of a destroyer . the cruiser is traveling in a direction 60 degrees N of E at 30 km hr^-1 and the destroyer is traveling at 15 km hr^-1. find the direction the destroyer must travel in order to get as close as possible to the cruiser there is complicating way to do this however there is also a easy way and i am trying to find out the easy way to do it.
the answer is 120 degrees .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
a cruiser is 12 km due west of a destroyer . the cruiser is traveling in a direction 60 degrees N of E at 30 km hr^-1 and the destroyer is traveling at 15 km hr^-1. find the direction the destroyer must travel in order to get as close as possible to the cruiser there is complicating way to do this however there is also a easy way and i am trying to find out the easy way to do it.
the answer is 120 degrees .

Let's see... it usually helps to draw a picture...
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5,>=stealth]
\def\x{110};
\def\t{0.3};
\node (C) at (0,0) {};
\node (D) at (12,0) {};
\node (C1) at ({30*\t*cos(60)}, {30*\t*sin(60)}) {};
\node (D1) at ({12+15*\t*cos(\x)}, {15*\t*sin(\x)}) {};
\fill (C) circle (0.1) node[below] {C};
\fill (D) circle (0.1) node[below] {D};
\fill (C1) circle (0.1) node[above] {C'};
\fill (D1) circle (0.1) node[above right] {D'};
\draw (D) -- +(3,0);
\draw[->,thick] (C) +(1,0) node[above right] {$60^\circ$} arc (0:60:1);
\draw[->,thick] (D) +(1,0) node[above right] {$x$} arc (0:\x:1);
\draw (C) -- node[below] {12} (D);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (C) -- node[above left] {30t} (C1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (D) -- node[above right] {15t} (D1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,red] (D1) -- node[above right] {d} (C1);
\end{tikzpicture}

The standard way to solve this, is to write $d^2$ as a function of both $x$ and $t$, and then find the critical point.
That is, set both partial derivatives to zero.
$$d^2=(30t\cos(60^\circ)-(12 + 15t\cos(x)))^2 + (30t\sin(60^\circ)-15t\sin(x))^2 \\ \pd{}t(d^2)=0 \\ \pd{}x(d^2)=0
$$
That's indeed a bit of work.
Wolfram says that the solution is $t=0.4$, $x=120^\circ$, and $d=6$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5,>=stealth]
\def\x{120};
\def\t{0.4};
\node (C) at (0,0) {};
\node (D) at (12,0) {};
\node (C1) at ({30*\t*cos(60)}, {30*\t*sin(60)}) {};
\node (D1) at ({12+15*\t*cos(\x)}, {15*\t*sin(\x)}) {};
\fill (C) circle (0.1) node[below] {C};
\fill (D) circle (0.1) node[below] {D};
\fill (C1) circle (0.1) node[above] {C'};
\fill (D1) circle (0.1) node[above right] {D'};
\draw (D) -- +(3,0);
\draw[->,thick] (C) +(1,0) node[above right] {$60^\circ$} arc (0:60:1);
\draw[->,thick] (D) +(1,0) node[above right] {$x$} arc (0:\x:1);
\draw (C) -- node[below] {12} (D);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (C) -- node[above left] {30t} (C1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (D) -- node[above right] {15t} (D1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,red] (D1) -- node[above right] {d} (C1);
\end{tikzpicture}

Now here's an interesting observation.
At the minimum the vector $\vec {DD'}$ is parallel to the distance vector $\vec d$.
That makes sense, since as long as there is an angle between them, we can improve the distance by reducing that angle by changing $x$ appropriately.
It means we can eliminate either $x$ or $t$ from the expression for the distance, and then take its derivative and set it to zero.
Still some work though.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K