MHB Cruiser & Destroyer: Finding the Closest Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter markosheehan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Point
markosheehan
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
a cruiser is 12 km due west of a destroyer . the cruiser is traveling in a direction 60 degrees N of E at 30 km hr^-1 and the destroyer is traveling at 15 km hr^-1. find the direction the destroyer must travel in order to get as close as possible to the cruiser there is complicating way to do this however there is also a easy way and i am trying to find out the easy way to do it.
the answer is 120 degrees .
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
markosheehan said:
a cruiser is 12 km due west of a destroyer . the cruiser is traveling in a direction 60 degrees N of E at 30 km hr^-1 and the destroyer is traveling at 15 km hr^-1. find the direction the destroyer must travel in order to get as close as possible to the cruiser there is complicating way to do this however there is also a easy way and i am trying to find out the easy way to do it.
the answer is 120 degrees .

Let's see... it usually helps to draw a picture...
\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5,>=stealth]
\def\x{110};
\def\t{0.3};
\node (C) at (0,0) {};
\node (D) at (12,0) {};
\node (C1) at ({30*\t*cos(60)}, {30*\t*sin(60)}) {};
\node (D1) at ({12+15*\t*cos(\x)}, {15*\t*sin(\x)}) {};
\fill (C) circle (0.1) node[below] {C};
\fill (D) circle (0.1) node[below] {D};
\fill (C1) circle (0.1) node[above] {C'};
\fill (D1) circle (0.1) node[above right] {D'};
\draw (D) -- +(3,0);
\draw[->,thick] (C) +(1,0) node[above right] {$60^\circ$} arc (0:60:1);
\draw[->,thick] (D) +(1,0) node[above right] {$x$} arc (0:\x:1);
\draw (C) -- node[below] {12} (D);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (C) -- node[above left] {30t} (C1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (D) -- node[above right] {15t} (D1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,red] (D1) -- node[above right] {d} (C1);
\end{tikzpicture}

The standard way to solve this, is to write $d^2$ as a function of both $x$ and $t$, and then find the critical point.
That is, set both partial derivatives to zero.
$$d^2=(30t\cos(60^\circ)-(12 + 15t\cos(x)))^2 + (30t\sin(60^\circ)-15t\sin(x))^2 \\ \pd{}t(d^2)=0 \\ \pd{}x(d^2)=0
$$
That's indeed a bit of work.
Wolfram says that the solution is $t=0.4$, $x=120^\circ$, and $d=6$.

\begin{tikzpicture}[scale=0.5,>=stealth]
\def\x{120};
\def\t{0.4};
\node (C) at (0,0) {};
\node (D) at (12,0) {};
\node (C1) at ({30*\t*cos(60)}, {30*\t*sin(60)}) {};
\node (D1) at ({12+15*\t*cos(\x)}, {15*\t*sin(\x)}) {};
\fill (C) circle (0.1) node[below] {C};
\fill (D) circle (0.1) node[below] {D};
\fill (C1) circle (0.1) node[above] {C'};
\fill (D1) circle (0.1) node[above right] {D'};
\draw (D) -- +(3,0);
\draw[->,thick] (C) +(1,0) node[above right] {$60^\circ$} arc (0:60:1);
\draw[->,thick] (D) +(1,0) node[above right] {$x$} arc (0:\x:1);
\draw (C) -- node[below] {12} (D);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (C) -- node[above left] {30t} (C1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,blue] (D) -- node[above right] {15t} (D1);
\draw[->,ultra thick,red] (D1) -- node[above right] {d} (C1);
\end{tikzpicture}

Now here's an interesting observation.
At the minimum the vector $\vec {DD'}$ is parallel to the distance vector $\vec d$.
That makes sense, since as long as there is an angle between them, we can improve the distance by reducing that angle by changing $x$ appropriately.
It means we can eliminate either $x$ or $t$ from the expression for the distance, and then take its derivative and set it to zero.
Still some work though.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top