Cumulative number counts of galaxy clusters

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mahya
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Clusters Galaxy
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on plotting cumulative number counts of galaxy clusters (N>S) as a function of X-ray flux using a mass function and scaling relation to calculate dN/dVdz. The user reports discrepancies between their results and observational data, specifically noting that their plot's slope differs significantly from expected outcomes. They seek assistance in troubleshooting their code and understanding the necessity of double integration over both redshift and flux ranges to accurately compute cumulative counts.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of galaxy cluster mass functions
  • Familiarity with scaling relations in astrophysics
  • Knowledge of double integration techniques in cosmology
  • Proficiency in data visualization tools for astrophysical data
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the mass function and scaling relation methodologies in galaxy cluster studies
  • Learn about the integration of dN/dVdz over redshift and flux ranges
  • Explore data visualization techniques specific to astrophysical datasets
  • Investigate observational results for cumulative number counts of galaxy clusters
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and data analysts involved in galaxy cluster research and those seeking to understand discrepancies between theoretical models and observational data.

mahya
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Dear all,

I am trying to plot the cumulative number counts of galaxy cluster (N>S) as a function of X-ray flux. The method I am following is using the mass function and scaling relation to calculate dN/dVdz. Then I do a double integrate over the redshift range and flux range. But the plot that I get has no connection with observational results. I am wondering if you could have a look at the codes and help me wo solve the problem.
 
Space news on Phys.org
How far off are your resuklts from the "observational" results that you are talking about and what are those results, yours and the observational ones? Also I don't under stand why you double integrated over the redshift range and flux range?
 
Actually the slope of my plot is totally different from the observation one. In attached images you can compare these two. The reason for integration is that we are supposed to calculate the cumulative number counts (N>S) and it should be integrated over the redshift range (0,Zmax) and (S, inf.).
 

Attachments

  • figure_1.png
    figure_1.png
    6.6 KB · Views: 416
  • N- Xray flux.png
    N- Xray flux.png
    34.8 KB · Views: 444

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K