Why should the Bullet Cluster focus light?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Earnest Guest
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bullet Focus Light
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Bullet Cluster demonstrates gravitational lensing, primarily due to its dark matter content, which is significantly greater than the observable stellar mass. The gas between the two colliding galaxy clusters does not focus light in a coherent manner, as it lacks the necessary symmetry and density profile. Instead, gravitational lensing occurs around the cluster, allowing for the observation of multiple images of distant galaxies. This phenomenon challenges modified gravity theories like MOND, which fail to account for the behavior of dark matter in such systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational lensing principles
  • Familiarity with dark matter and its role in cosmic structures
  • Knowledge of the Bullet Cluster's significance in astrophysics
  • Basic grasp of Einstein's theory of general relativity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of gravitational lensing and its mathematical models
  • Explore the implications of dark matter in galaxy formation and evolution
  • Study the differences between gravitational lensing and optical lensing
  • Investigate modified gravity theories, particularly MOND, and their critiques
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, astrophysicists, and students studying cosmology, particularly those interested in dark matter and gravitational lensing phenomena.

  • #31
Earnest Guest said:
From your comments, you also don't understand the difference between strong lensing and weak lensing. I suggest you go back and review the materials before trying to act as an 'advisor' on this subject again. There is simply no foundation for being able to simplify a weak lensing problem as a point source. You must perform a statistical analysis of all the stars in a region before you can draw a contour map. There's some good material on the Wiki pages about it.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weak_gravitational_lensing
Earnest Guest said:
I'm afraid you just haven't been following the conversation. In addition, I don't think you have a grasp of the concepts here. The Bullet Cluster doesn't have enough mass to create any strong lensing effects. The only effects are 'weak' lensing effects which can only be seen in a statistical blip in the shape of the stars inside the projected radius of the cluster.

?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #32
marcus said:
?
Exactly
 
  • #33
The weak lensing effect extends out beyond the projected radius of the cluster which is causing the lensing.

And it is typically measured from the distortion of the shapes of galaxies (not individual stars) which are out beyond the cluster causing the lensing.
 
  • #34
phinds said:
Just as an aside, you have STILL never acknowledged your mistake in thinking that convexity/concavity has something to do with gravitational lensing and that there is a similarity with optical lensing. Do you still believe that it is true?
Take two black holes. Place them relatively close together. Now look at a distant SNe Ia that lies directly between the two black holes. Will this supernova appear to be magnified or de-magnified?
 
  • #35
This may be a case of "don't feed the argument". We've had plenty of calm peaceful friendly discussion of weak lensing (e.g. as used to map concentration of DM mass) here at PF since, as I recall, 2005. We don't need vituperation about who said what and who was wrong etc etc. It doesn't add any useful understanding. AFAICS. That is just my private opinion---I'm not a mentor (they do the moderating).
I'd give everybody a pass and lock the thread, if it were up to me.
 
  • #36
Closed pending moderation.

Edit. I think we will leave it closed. Everyone has voiced their position.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K