Curl operator for time-varying vector

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Curl Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the curl operator for the vector ##\mathbf{A} = R(-\sin(\omega t)\mathbf{x}+\cos(\omega t)\mathbf{y})##. The confusion arises from whether ##\mathbf{A}## is treated as a vector or a vector field. It is established that a vector field, which has a curl, must be defined at every point in space, while a single vector does not. The conclusion is that if interpreted as a uniform vector field, the curl is zero, whereas if treated as a time-dependent vector, the curl can yield ##\nabla \times \mathbf{A} = 2 \mathbf{z}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically curl operations.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of vector fields versus single vectors.
  • Knowledge of orthogonal unit vectors in three-dimensional space.
  • Basic understanding of trigonometric functions and their relationship to vector components.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector fields and their implications in physics.
  • Learn about curl operations in vector calculus, including practical examples.
  • Explore the relationship between time-dependent vectors and their spatial representations.
  • Investigate the implications of uniform versus non-uniform vector fields in fluid dynamics.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus, particularly in applications involving fluid dynamics and electromagnetism.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have the following vector ##\mathbf{A} = R(-\sin(\omega t)\mathbf{x}+\cos(\omega t)\mathbf{y})##, where ##\mathbf{x}## and ##\mathbf{y}## are orthogonal unit vectors (aslo orthogonal to ##\mathbf{z}##). I want to calculate ##\nabla \times \mathbf{A}##, but I am a bit confused. The curl operator involves partial derivatives with respect to x, y and z, so in the form above I would have ##\nabla \times \mathbf{A} = 0## . However, I know that ##\sin(\omega t) = \frac{y(t)}{R}## and ##\cos(\omega t) = \frac{x(t)}{R}## so I can write ##\mathbf{A} = R(-\frac{y}{R}\mathbf{x}+\frac{x}{R}\mathbf{y})##, in which case ##\nabla \times \mathbf{A} = 2 \mathbf{z} ##. Which is the right way to do this and why? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to decide whether you are defining a vector or a vector field. A vector field has a curl. A single vector does not.
The definition you've given above says it is a vector.

Further, a vector field must be defined at every point in the space we are considering, so there is no role for specifying "location at time t" which is what your use of y(t) and x(t) appears to do. Location of what?

To calculate a curl you need a vector field, which means you need a formula that specifies the vector at each point in the space. Although your definition above says it is for a vector, not a vector field, we can interpret it as saying that the field is uniform across space, having that magnitude and direction everywhere. With that interpretation, the curl is zero.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin, Vanadium 50 and Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
806
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
579
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K