Current of Complex scalar field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving the current for a Complex Scalar Field using Noether's Theorem. The Lagrangian provided is \(L = (\partial_\mu \phi)(\partial^\mu \phi^*) - m^2 \phi^* \phi\), which is invariant under the transformation \(\phi \rightarrow e^{-i\Lambda} \phi\) and \(\phi^* \rightarrow e^{i\Lambda} \phi^*\). The derived current is expressed as \(J^{\mu} = i(\Lambda \phi^* \partial _\mu \phi - \Lambda \phi \partial ^\mu \phi^*)\). The absence of \(\Lambda\) in the final current equation is clarified, confirming that the current is defined as the expression proportional to the infinitesimal group parameter.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noether's Theorem
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics
  • Knowledge of complex scalar fields in quantum field theory
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical notation used in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of Noether's Theorem in various physical systems
  • Explore the derivation of currents for other field types, such as Dirac fields
  • Investigate the role of symmetries in quantum field theory
  • Learn about gauge invariance and its applications in particle physics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory, graduate students studying theoretical physics, and researchers interested in the application of Noether's Theorem to derive conserved currents.

PhyAmateur
Messages
103
Reaction score
2
I was trying to derive current for Complex Scalar Field and I ran into the following:So we know that the Lagrangian is:

$$L = (\partial_\mu \phi)(\partial^\mu \phi^*) - m^2 \phi^* \phi$$
The Lagrangian is invariant under the transformation:
$$\phi \rightarrow e^{-i\Lambda} \phi $$ and $$\phi^* \rightarrow e^{i\Lambda} \phi^* $$

Infinitesimal Transformation:
$$\delta \phi = -i\Lambda \phi$$ and $$\delta \phi^* = i\Lambda \phi^*$$

So, applying Noether's Theorem and using the Lagrangian above,

I get

$$J^{\mu} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi} (-i\Lambda \phi) + \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_\mu \phi^*} (i\Lambda \phi^*) =$$
$$\partial ^\mu \phi^* (-i\Lambda \phi) + \partial _\mu \phi (i\Lambda \phi) = $$
$$ i(\Lambda \phi^* \partial _\mu \phi - \Lambda \phi \partial ^\mu \phi^*)$$

but as I googled it there is no $$\Lambda$$ in the final equation of the current. What did I do wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You did nothing wrong. The current is simply defined as the expression proportional to the infinitesimal group parameter.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhyAmateur
Ah phew! Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K