Curvature of light and its effect on reality

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of gravitational lensing as it relates to the perception of light and reality. A teacher suggested that light can appear in different locations based on the observer's position, which was challenged by participants who clarified that this phenomenon is due to gravitational lensing in general relativity. Gravitational lensing occurs when a massive body, like a black hole or the Sun, bends light from distant stars, causing them to appear in altered positions. However, this does not change the actual location of the stars; it merely affects how they are perceived by different observers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of general relativity
  • Basic knowledge of gravitational lensing
  • Familiarity with the concept of light propagation
  • Awareness of observational astronomy
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "gravitational lensing in general relativity"
  • Explore "the physics of light propagation and perception"
  • Study "the effects of massive bodies on light paths"
  • Investigate "philosophical implications of perception in physics"
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators in science, and anyone interested in the intersection of relativity and philosophical discussions about reality and perception.

Jeremy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Today my teacher mentioned a past article in scientific american that dealt with the modification of reality due to relativity.

According to her (and i am not sure this is true) light can be perceived in different places according to the position of different people. For instance, if i am standing in the center of a football field and see a beam of light hit the scoreboard, a person standing in an endzone might see that same beam of light hitting a tree nearby. from this, she suggested that the two people would be perceiving a different reality, and she suggested we apply the idea to a philosophical subject we were studying.

I have never heard of anything like this, though i do understand relativity and, to a certain extent, quantum mechanics. however, my teacher was very adament about this article's content.

has anyone heard of anything like this? i don't want to tell my teacher she is dead wrong, so similar things would also be welcomed.

thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps your teacher misinterpreted gravitational lensing. Gravitational lensing is an effect in general relativity where the gravity of a body causes light to take a curved path. It is true that if you look at distant stars and there is a body of large density between you and the distant star (such as a black hole or the Sun) then you could see the distant stars in a place where they really aren't. This is due to the fact that the light traveling from the star will curve around the Sun, so you'll see it in a different place than it actually is. This doesn't represent a change in reality though. In reality, the star is still where it is, no matter who observes it. It's the same idea as normal lenses or mirrors. If you look at an object in a mirror, the light from that object bounces off the mirror and comes to your eyes, so you see the object in a place where it really isn't. That doesn't mean that there's some sort of change in reality. In reality the object exists in one place, but because you have a mirror you can see it in two places.
 
For instance, if i am standing in the center of a football field and see a beam of light hit the scoreboard, a person standing in an endzone might see that same beam of light hitting a tree nearby.
:confused:
The article might have been talking about gravitational lensing, but that couldn't be percived on Earth like that, at least. Do you have a link to the article by any chance?

i don't want to tell my teacher she is dead wrong, so similar things would also be welcomed.
I know how you feel. I got into arguments with my philosophy teacher about physics (usually GR) several times.

EDIT: Not fast enough...
 
Last edited:
Unfortunately, I don't have the article. However, thank you for helping with what you could. I thought the argument seemed a bit illogical.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 45 ·
2
Replies
45
Views
6K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
12K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
13K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K