I Curved spacetime and measurement direction

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Hill
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the measurement of photon polarizations in an EPR entangled state between two observers, Alice and Bob, separated by vast distances. It raises the question of how to define "the same direction" for their measurements in curved spacetime. The assumption is that this direction is determined by parallel transport, which is influenced by the trajectories of the photons as they travel to Alice and Bob. The inquiry suggests that the curvature of spacetime plays a crucial role in defining measurement directions for entangled particles. Understanding this relationship is essential for deeper insights into quantum entanglement in the context of general relativity.
Hill
Messages
735
Reaction score
576
TL;DR
How are parallel directions for measurements of entangled particles defined in locations which are far from each other?
To be specific, let's say that two photons in EPR entangled state were sent to Alice and Bob separated by billions of light years. We know that if they measure their photon polarizations in the same direction, they certainly get the same result. My question is, what is the same direction in their case?
I assume that this is determined by the parallel transport in curved spacetime and depends on trajectories of the photons between their origin and Alice and Bob respectively. Is this assumption correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In Birkhoff’s theorem, doesn’t assuming we can use r (defined as circumference divided by ## 2 \pi ## for any given sphere) as a coordinate across the spacetime implicitly assume that the spheres must always be getting bigger in some specific direction? Is there a version of the proof that doesn’t have this limitation? I’m thinking about if we made a similar move on 2-dimensional manifolds that ought to exhibit infinite order rotational symmetry. A cylinder would clearly fit, but if we...

Similar threads