Cyclic Group Generators <z10, +> Mod 10 group of additive integers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the cyclic group Mod 10, specifically addressing the generators of the group Z10 = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9}. It is established that the set {2,5} serves as a generating set for Z10, despite neither 2 nor 5 being individual generators. The proof involves demonstrating that combining elements of {2,5} through the group operation yields all members of Z10, confirming that <2,5> generates the entire group.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically cyclic groups
  • Familiarity with modular arithmetic, particularly Mod 10 operations
  • Knowledge of generating sets and subgroup definitions
  • Ability to perform basic arithmetic operations in modular systems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of cyclic groups in abstract algebra
  • Learn about subgroup generation and the concept of generating sets
  • Explore modular arithmetic applications in number theory
  • Investigate examples of other groups and their generators
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in group theory and modular arithmetic will benefit from this discussion.

DUDEEGG
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
So I take <z10, +> this to be the group


Z10 = {0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9} Mod 10 group of additive integers and I worked out the group generators, I won't do all of them but here's an example :

<3> gives {3,6,9,2,5,8,1,4,7,0}
on the other hand

<2> gives {2,4,6,8,0} and that's it! but my book says prove that 2 and 5 are generators...these two I thought we not generators...what am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure that you are reading the question correctly? As you have noted, neither 2 nor 5 is a generator of ##Z_{10}##. However, the set ##\{2,5\}## does generate ##Z_{10}##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Can you give me more info about {2,5} generating Z10? feel like I must be misunderstanding how to Generate Z10. Thanks for the help :)
 
We say that ##\{2,5\}## is a generating set for ##Z_{10}##. Here is the definition:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Generating_set_of_a_group

Briefly, if ##S## is any subset of a group ##G##, then we define ##\langle S\rangle## to be the smallest subgroup of ##G## which contains ##S##. To be more precise, ##\langle S\rangle## is the intersection of all subgroups of ##G## which contain ##S##. We call ##\langle S\rangle## the subgroup generated by ##S##, and we say that ##S## is a generating set for ##\langle S\rangle##.

In the special case where ##S## contains one element, say ##S = \{x\}##, we usually write ##\langle x \rangle## instead of ##\langle \{x\}\rangle##.

Applying these notions to your question, we want to prove that if ##S = \{2,5\}##, then the smallest subgroup of ##Z_{10}## which contains ##S## is ##Z_{10}## itself. In other words, we want to prove that ##\langle S\rangle = Z_{10}##.

To prove this, note that since ##S## contains ##2##, it must be true that ##\langle S\rangle## contains ##\langle 2\rangle##. (Why?) Likewise, since ##S## contains ##5##, it must hold that ##\langle S \rangle## contains ##\langle 5\rangle##. What can you conclude?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
A group, G, is generated by a set, S, of members of G if and only if by combining the members of S using the group operation, we get every member of G. The set {3} gives, as you say all members of Z10 because 3= 3, 3+ 3= 6, 3+ 3+ 3= 9, 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 12= 2 (mod 10), 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 15= 5 (mod 10), 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 18= 8 (mod 10), 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 21= 1 (mod 10), 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 24= 4 (mod 10), 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 27= 7 (mod 10), and 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3+ 3= 30= 0 (mod 10).

{2} does not generate Z10 because 2= 2, 2+ 2= 4, 2+ 2+ 2= 6, 2+ 2+ 2+ 2= 8, 2+ 2+ 2+2+ 2= 10= 0 (mod 10), 2+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 2= 12= 2 (mod 10) and now it starts over. We do NOT get 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9.

{5} does not generate Z10 because 5= 5, 5+ 5= 10= 0 (mod10), 5+ 5+5 = 15= 5 (mod 10) and it just repeats. We do not get 1, 2, 3 4, 6, 7, 8, or 9.

But {2, 5} contains all of those and 2+ 5= 7, 2+ 2+ 5= 9, 2+ 2+ 2+ 5= 11= 1 (mod 10), 2+ 2+ 2+ 2+ 5= 13= 3 (mod 10) so that we have all of 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 0.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
HallsofIvy EGGGZELLENT Thx :) u2
jbunniii
 
If there are an infinite number of natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two natural numbers, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and an infinite number of fractions in between any two of those fractions, and... then that must mean that there are not only infinite infinities, but an infinite number of those infinities. and an infinite number of those...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
896