- #1

ChrisVer

Gold Member

- 3,380

- 461

I have one question here, let's take the cyclic group of order three: [itex]C_3 = \{ e, c, c^2 \} [/itex]. By Cayley's theorem, this should be isomorphic to some subgroup of [itex]S_3 [/itex].

The subgroups of [itex]S_3[/itex] are pretty definite, and they are also normal subgroups , created by the union of conjugacy classes. They are the [itex] \{ (.) \} [/itex] , [itex] S_3 [/itex] (both trivial) and the union of [itex] \{ (.) \} \cup \{ (...) \}[/itex] which is the Alternating group [itex]A_3 [/itex].

Is it correct to say then that [itex]C_3 \cong A_3 [/itex] ? the orders seem to match.

On the other hand what happens if I go for example to [itex]C_4 [/itex] ? In that case the subgroups of [itex]S_4[/itex] will be:

1. [itex] \{ e \}[/itex]

2. [itex] S_4 [/itex]

3. [itex] \{ (.) \} \cup \{ (..)(..) \} \cong C_2 \times C_2 [/itex]

4. [itex] \{ (.) \} \cup \{ (...) \} \cup \{ (..)(..) \} \cong A_4[/itex]

My problem is that in this case, the only "order" which matches is the [itex]C_2 \times C_2[/itex], But I don't think that the Klein 4-group is isomorphic to the cyclic group, because the orders of the elements don't match. Any help?