Cyclic Symmetry Analysis: Capturing Features

Click For Summary
Cyclic symmetry analysis in FEM for models with non-integer divisible features, such as 136 holes and 52 slots, poses challenges in determining the best approach. Using the lowest common divisor of 2 suggests a 180° sector, which may not provide significant benefits over a full 3D model. Aerospace applications often utilize small sector cuts based on turbine geometry, but the varying divisibility of surrounding features complicates this method. Options include leaving minor features as they are for FEM to repeat, potentially causing overlapping geometry, or adjusting the number of features to ensure divisibility by the sector count. Ultimately, the decision should be based on the significance of the features in relation to the overall model.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I am wondering what kind of approaches people take to a cyclic symmetry analysis in FEM when you have multiple repeating features that don't divide to the same integer. Take the example below for example. I have a N_HOLES = 136 and I have N_SLOTS = 52.

I am not sure what to do here. The lowest common divisor is 2 which would mean doing a 180° sector, which is hardly better than running full 3D. I know that in Aerospace, they use small sector cuts based on Turbine geometry all the time. Obviously not all of the surrounding features divide the same as the turbine geometry.

But what should be done about those features? Do we just leave them as they are and let the the FEM repeat those features even if it leads to "overlapping geometry"? Or do we change the number of those features such that they are all divisible by the number of sectors.

If my question is unclear, please let me know.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    13 KB · Views: 418
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have to use your skill and judgment. First decide what questions the model is supposed to answer. ("Tell me everything about the structure" isn't a useful question to ask the model!)

If those slots and holes are minor features of the whole model, you could probably approximate them the same way as you would in an axisymmetric model. On the other hand if they are the important features you might need to make a full model.
 
Had my central air system checked when it sortta wasn't working. I guess I hadn't replaced the filter. Guy suggested I might want to get a UV filter accessory. He said it would "kill bugs and particulates". I know UV can kill the former, not sure how he thinks it's gonna murder the latter. Now I'm finding out there's more than one type of UV filter: one for the air flow and one for the coil. He was suggesting we might get one for the air flow, but now we'll have to change the bulb...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
545
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K