Cyclic Symmetry Analysis: Capturing Features

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Cyclic symmetry analysis in Finite Element Method (FEM) is crucial when dealing with multiple repeating features that do not share a common divisor, as illustrated by the example of N_HOLES = 136 and N_SLOTS = 52. The discussion emphasizes the importance of determining whether to maintain overlapping geometry or adjust feature counts for divisibility by sector numbers. Aerospace applications often utilize small sector cuts based on turbine geometry, which can inform decisions in similar contexts. Ultimately, the choice between full 3D modeling and sector approximation hinges on the significance of the features in question.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Finite Element Method (FEM) principles
  • Familiarity with cyclic symmetry analysis techniques
  • Knowledge of geometric modeling in aerospace applications
  • Ability to assess feature significance in engineering models
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced techniques in cyclic symmetry analysis for FEM
  • Explore methods for handling overlapping geometry in FEM models
  • Learn about sector modeling in aerospace applications, particularly for turbine geometries
  • Investigate the impact of feature significance on modeling decisions in FEM
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, aerospace designers, and FEM analysts seeking to optimize cyclic symmetry analysis in complex models with repeating features.

Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
I am wondering what kind of approaches people take to a cyclic symmetry analysis in FEM when you have multiple repeating features that don't divide to the same integer. Take the example below for example. I have a N_HOLES = 136 and I have N_SLOTS = 52.

I am not sure what to do here. The lowest common divisor is 2 which would mean doing a 180° sector, which is hardly better than running full 3D. I know that in Aerospace, they use small sector cuts based on Turbine geometry all the time. Obviously not all of the surrounding features divide the same as the turbine geometry.

But what should be done about those features? Do we just leave them as they are and let the the FEM repeat those features even if it leads to "overlapping geometry"? Or do we change the number of those features such that they are all divisible by the number of sectors.

If my question is unclear, please let me know.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    13 KB · Views: 431
Engineering news on Phys.org
You have to use your skill and judgment. First decide what questions the model is supposed to answer. ("Tell me everything about the structure" isn't a useful question to ask the model!)

If those slots and holes are minor features of the whole model, you could probably approximate them the same way as you would in an axisymmetric model. On the other hand if they are the important features you might need to make a full model.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K