Cyclotomic polynomials and primitive roots of unity

Click For Summary
Primitive roots of unity of orders n and m are roots of their respective cyclotomic polynomials, φ_n(x) and φ_m(y), which serve as their minimal polynomials. The discussion focuses on finding the minimal polynomial of the field generated by the primitive roots w_n and w_m together. It is suggested that the minimal polynomial can be determined by examining specific examples, such as combining a 6th and a 15th root of unity, which leads to a primitive 30th root of unity. The conversation emphasizes that there is no singular minimal polynomial for a field; instead, a generating element must be chosen, typically a primitive root of unity of the least common multiple of the two orders. Understanding these relationships is crucial for exploring the properties of cyclotomic fields.
xuying1209
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
w_{n} is primitive root of unity of order n, w_{m} is primitive root of unity of order m,
all primitve roots of unity of order n are roots of Cyclotomic polynomials
phi_{n}(x) which is a minimal polynomial of all primitive roots of unity of order n ,
similarly, phi_{m}(y) is a minimal polynomial of all primitive roots of unity of order m ,
then, what is the minimal polynomial of (W_{n},w_{m}), if exists or no?

Thank you very much! what book I can find some subject about primitve roots of unity.:wink:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
are you asking for the minimal polynomial of a product of two roots of 1?

or of the field they generate together?

and I presume you are working over the rationals Q, since yiou assume the cyclotomic polynomials are irreducible.i like van der waerden's old modern algebra, for a basic introduction. probably Gauss's disquisitiones is one of the best sources, but most number theoiry and abstract algebra books will say something, like hungerford, dummit - foote, michael artin, jacobson.
 
I want to know the minimal polynomial of the field they generate together?

Thank you !:wink:
 
have you tried an example? for instance suppose z is a primitive complex 6th root of unity and w is a primitive complex 15th root of unity. then together they belong to the group of let's see 30th roots of unity. If you take say z^3, you get hmmmm -1 i suppose. anyway, it looks as if -w is a primitive 30th root of unity. is that right? then -w^5 sems like a primitive 6 th root of unity, and w a primitive 15th root.

so it seems that together they generate the same field as w does alone.try another one, like 18th root and 12th root. what happens?
 
by the way there is no such thing as"the minimal polynomial of a field", you need to choose a generating element first, but here you can always choose it to be another primitive root of unity, perhaps of roder the lcm of the two orders you start with?
 
I am studying the mathematical formalism behind non-commutative geometry approach to quantum gravity. I was reading about Hopf algebras and their Drinfeld twist with a specific example of the Moyal-Weyl twist defined as F=exp(-iλ/2θ^(μν)∂_μ⊗∂_ν) where λ is a constant parametar and θ antisymmetric constant tensor. {∂_μ} is the basis of the tangent vector space over the underlying spacetime Now, from my understanding the enveloping algebra which appears in the definition of the Hopf algebra...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
11K