Cylinder vs Rectangular Prism: Which is More Economical for Juice Packaging?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter englishbum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optimization
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion concludes that a cylinder is the more economical shape for juice packaging compared to a rectangular prism. Both shapes are designed to contain 335cm3 of juice, but the cylinder requires less material due to its curved surface, resulting in lower overall material costs. Additionally, the cylinder allows for more efficient stacking and packing, further reducing transportation and storage expenses. While the rectangular prism offers a comfortable hand-held depth of 4cm, this convenience does not outweigh the cost benefits of using a cylinder.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric shapes and their properties
  • Basic knowledge of volume and surface area calculations
  • Familiarity with material cost considerations in packaging
  • Awareness of consumer preferences in product design
NEXT STEPS
  • Research surface area calculations for cylinders and rectangular prisms
  • Explore material cost analysis for packaging solutions
  • Investigate consumer preferences in beverage packaging design
  • Learn about efficient stacking and packing techniques for shipping
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for packaging engineers, product designers, and beverage manufacturers seeking to optimize packaging efficiency and material costs while considering consumer usability.

englishbum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have a really tough question and need like emergency help and aid...

a juice manufacturer is studying the most economical shape to use for a beverage container. Each unit will contain 335cm^3 of juice. The manufacturer is considering a cylinder versus a rectangular prism with a comfortable hand-held depth of 4cm. Which method od packaging, the can or the juice box, will use the minimum amount of materials?

Thanks in advance for the help...tonnes o'thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If I understand the problem, you have a rectangluar prism and a cylinder, both of which have a certain constrained hieght, you are given the necessary volume, and you need to see which has less surface area. This isn't hard at all, and doesn't even involve calculus. Just keep in mind that the two unknown sides of the prism must be equal by symmetry, then find these sides and the radius, and see which shape has a smaller surface area.
 


To determine which shape is more economical for juice packaging, we need to consider the amount of materials used for each shape and the cost of those materials.

A cylinder has a circular base and a curved surface, while a rectangular prism has a rectangular base and flat surfaces. In terms of materials, a cylinder will require less material for its curved surface compared to a rectangular prism's flat surfaces. This means that a cylinder will use less material overall, making it more economical.

Additionally, a cylinder's curved surface allows for more efficient stacking and packing, which can also save on transportation and storage costs.

On the other hand, a rectangular prism has the advantage of a comfortable hand-held depth of 4cm, which may be more convenient for consumers. However, this may not necessarily outweigh the cost savings of using a cylinder.

In conclusion, based on the amount of materials used and potential cost savings, a cylinder would be the more economical choice for juice packaging. However, it is important for the juice manufacturer to also consider consumer preferences and convenience when making their final decision.