Why Is Calculating the Normalization Constant in Quantum Mechanics Challenging?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the challenges of calculating the normalization constant A in quantum mechanics, specifically for the wave function Ψ(x,t) = A * 2 * [a * x * (e^(-ax^2/2)) * (e^(-3/2iwt)]. The correct normalization constant is A = (1/(2^(1/2))) * ((a/π)^(1/4)). A common error identified was misinterpreting the question regarding the square root's coverage, leading to incorrect calculations. Participants emphasized the importance of carefully reading the problem statement to avoid such mistakes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with wave functions and normalization in quantum systems
  • Knowledge of integral calculus, particularly Gaussian integrals
  • Experience with complex exponentials in wave functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Gaussian integrals and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about normalization conditions for wave functions in quantum systems
  • Explore the properties of odd and even functions in mathematical physics
  • Review common pitfalls in interpreting quantum mechanics problems
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, theoretical physicists, and anyone studying quantum mechanics who seeks to understand normalization constants and their calculations.

lol physics
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Hi, 2nd year physics student here

doing a past paper on quantum mechanics everything is going nice and dandy then this happens..

question: prove that the normalisation constant A is given by A = \frac{1}{2^1^/^2} (\frac{a}{\pi})^1/4

ok seems fairly straight forward but i keep getting this A = \frac{1}{2^1^/^2 (a*\pi)^1^/^4}

wave function ------> \Psi (x,t) = A*2*[a*x*(e^-ax^2/2)(e^-3/2iwt)

useful integral: Inegration from - infinity to + infinity of x^{2}*e^{-C}^{x^{}2} dx = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{\pi}{C^{3}})^{\frac{1}{2}}

any flawless mathematicians out there..?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to Physics Forums :smile:

lol physics said:
any flawless mathematicians out there..?
Nope ... there's no such thing!

Can you show the integral you set up to calculate A?
 
any one?
 
If you show more steps of your work, we might be able to spot where you went wrong.
 
you have the wave function, you have what the answer should be and you have the identity integral needed to solve this. I gave you the answer i kept receiving, my friend who is a theoretical physicist also received the same answer, if you do in fact obtain the right answer can you show a step by step of how it was obtained, if you received the same answer as us then there may be a problem with the actual question.
 
could have something to do with odd functions and even functions. I got a problem like this. It ended up being 0 because it was an odd function and with even functions you double.
 
lol physics, I agree that A is proportional to a-1/4
 
Last edited:
If you think the problem is wrong, why don't you just plug in their normalization constant and see if you get 1? If you don't get 1, then there is probably something wrong.
 
found the problem sorry, i was reading the question wrongly. you can use this thread as an example of why you should read questions properly, i thought the square root was covering the whole wave function but it was only covering one of the constants. thank you for all your help.
 

Similar threads

Replies
46
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K