Could a New Field Explain Dark Matter's Role in the Universe?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the exploration of alternative theories to dark matter, specifically addressing the potential for a new field connected to baryonic matter. Theories like MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) and TeVeS (Tensor-Vector-Scalar gravity) are evaluated for their ability to explain phenomena such as the Bullet Cluster and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) peaks. While MOND offers a simple predictive model, it lacks theoretical robustness, particularly in explaining galaxy cluster dynamics. TeVeS, although more complex and parameter-rich, still struggles to provide a satisfactory theoretical framework.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity and its implications.
  • Familiarity with Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) and its limitations.
  • Knowledge of Tensor-Vector-Scalar gravity (TeVeS) and its applications.
  • Basic concepts of baryonic matter and dark matter interactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of the Bullet Cluster on dark matter theories.
  • Explore the mathematical foundations of MOND and its refinements.
  • Investigate the parameters and predictions of TeVeS in astrophysical contexts.
  • Examine current observational evidence for and against modified gravity theories.
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, and cosmologists interested in the theoretical underpinnings of dark matter and alternative gravitational theories.

bluecap
Messages
395
Reaction score
13
For the universe extra source of gravity, why don't they propose some kind of field connected to our matter instead of dark matter?
 
Space news on Phys.org
To account for the bullet cluster and for BAO peaks you'd need to construct a field that is separate from baryonic matter. TeVeS does this, but in the end you just get dark matter by a different name.

The latter part of the following talk covers this issue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mary Space
bluecap said:
For the universe extra source of gravity, why don't they propose some kind of field connected to our matter instead of dark matter?
The standard mainline theory of gravity is General Relativity, in which no such additional field exists.

There are alternative theories, such as MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) and its later refinements, which assume modifications to the laws of gravity. MOND leads to a beautifully simple rule with only one universal parameter which is remarkably successful in predicting rotation curves of galaxies, but it is extremely unsatisfactory from a theoretical point of view (for example the force caused by two masses on each other is unequal, and a star or star system as a whole somehow moves differently from the particles which make it up). It also apparently fails to explain the motion of galaxies within a cluster. More complex theories exist (such as TeVeS) which have a similar effect to MOND, are more theoretically self-consistent and can provide a better fit for observations, but they do this by having many more parameters and they are still not very satisfactory from a theoretical point of view.

The "Bullet Cluster" is often considered to provide strong evidence against any modified gravity theory because observations appear to show that there is a concentration of invisible matter which is not in the same location as the visible matter.
 
The 'Bullet Cluster' showed DM still associated with the visible matter after two galaxies that had 'colllided', that is the two galaxies passed through each other but with a X-ray source that had been left between them.

This is interpredted as the non-interacting DM staying with the stars of the galaxies, which passed by each other, but the two galaxy-wide clouds of interstellar gas had collided and combined with each other and so heated to over ~ 106 oK, thus emitting X-rays, and this combined cloud was left behind in the centre.

Garth
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
590
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Featured
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K