bluecap
- 395
- 13
For the universe extra source of gravity, why don't they propose some kind of field connected to our matter instead of dark matter?
The discussion centers on the exploration of alternative theories to dark matter, specifically addressing the potential for a new field connected to baryonic matter. Theories like MOND (Modified Newtonian Dynamics) and TeVeS (Tensor-Vector-Scalar gravity) are evaluated for their ability to explain phenomena such as the Bullet Cluster and baryon acoustic oscillations (BAO) peaks. While MOND offers a simple predictive model, it lacks theoretical robustness, particularly in explaining galaxy cluster dynamics. TeVeS, although more complex and parameter-rich, still struggles to provide a satisfactory theoretical framework.
PREREQUISITESAstronomers, physicists, and cosmologists interested in the theoretical underpinnings of dark matter and alternative gravitational theories.
The standard mainline theory of gravity is General Relativity, in which no such additional field exists.bluecap said:For the universe extra source of gravity, why don't they propose some kind of field connected to our matter instead of dark matter?