Dating Methods: Uncovering Earth's History

  • Thread starter Thread starter ArmitageT1
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods used to date objects in the Earth's crust, particularly fossils, and how these methods lead to estimates of the age of significant events in Earth's history, such as the arrival of dinosaurs. The conversation touches on various dating techniques, including carbon-14 and radiometric dating methods, and explores the implications of these methods in the context of differing beliefs about the age of the Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • C.J. inquires about how fossils are dated and expresses frustration over differing beliefs regarding the age of the Earth, specifically contrasting scientific estimates with a fundamentalist Christian perspective.
  • Some participants mention potassium-argon dating as a method for dating geological materials.
  • Others highlight various radiometric dating methods that provide ages in millions or billions of years, noting the reliance on assumptions regarding starting conditions, decay rates, and system isolation.
  • One participant points out that while isotope ratios are key to dating, some Christian scientists suggest the possibility of accelerated decay rates to align with a younger Earth perspective.
  • A participant references an article that critiques the assumptions underlying radiometric dating, suggesting that these assumptions are unprovable.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of radiometric dating methods and the assumptions involved. There is no consensus on the implications of these methods for the age of the Earth, and the discussion reflects ongoing debate between scientific and religious perspectives.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the unprovable nature of assumptions in radiometric dating and the varying interpretations of scientific data in light of personal beliefs.

ArmitageT1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm new here and have a rather simple question... how are objects in the Earth's crust, such as fossils, dated? I understand that 40,000-65,000 years is the average availability of years that certain organic materials can be dated with carbon-14 dating, so how are numbers of years such as the arrival of the dinosaurs 250 million years ago discovered?

This is a topic my uncle and I frequently argue on. He's a fundamentalist Christian and states the Earth is around 10,000 years old (something I get nearly furious with every time we discuss the issue) and of course this statement isn't based on science, but I wouldn't know how to respond if he asked me HOW we know that dinosaurs first walked the Earth 250 million years ago.

I apologize if this is an extremely mundane topic for most of you (I imagine it is) and that if it gets in the way of many more complex issues.

Thanks,
C.J.
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
Welcome, C.J. Don't worry about asking. We have to start somewhere of course, anyway I think you might want to read this paper very carefully

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens.html
 
Last edited:
Thanks

Andre said:
Welcome, C.J. Don't worry about asking. We have to start somewhere of course, anyway I think you might want to read this paper very carefully

http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens.html

Thank you very much for the link. This explains a lot.
 
ArmitageT1 said:
Hi all,

I'm new here and have a rather simple question... how are objects in the Earth's crust, such as fossils, dated? I understand that 40,000-65,000 years is the average availability of years that certain organic materials can be dated with carbon-14 dating, so how are numbers of years such as the arrival of the dinosaurs 250 million years ago discovered?

This is a topic my uncle and I frequently argue on. He's a fundamentalist Christian and states the Earth is around 10,000 years old (something I get nearly furious with every time we discuss the issue) and of course this statement isn't based on science, but I wouldn't know how to respond if he asked me HOW we know that dinosaurs first walked the Earth 250 million years ago.

I apologize if this is an extremely mundane topic for most of you (I imagine it is) and that if it gets in the way of many more complex issues.

Thanks,
C.J.
The answer is simple, Potassium-Argon Dating
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Potassium_argon_dating
 
The following quoted text is from this article: http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2002/carbon_dating.asp"

This is the basis for your Uncle's argument.

There are various other radiometric dating methods used today to give ages of millions or billions of years for rocks. These techniques, unlike carbon dating, mostly use the relative concentrations of parent and daughter products in radioactive decay chains. For example, potassium-40 decays to argon-40; uranium-238 decays to lead-206 via other elements like radium; uranium-235 decays to lead-207; rubidium-87 decays to strontium-87; etc. These techniques are applied to igneous rocks, and are normally seen as giving the time since solidification.

The isotope concentrations can be measured very accurately, but isotope concentrations are not dates. To derive ages from such measurements, unprovable assumptions have to be made such as:

1. The starting conditions are known (for example, that there was no daughter isotope present at the start, or that we know how much was there).

2. Decay rates have always been constant.

3. Systems were closed or isolated so that no parent or daughter isotopes were lost or added.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Weell obviously isotope ratios are the answer. But it's interesting to note that some christian scientists propose that god (or some other mighty force) sped up the decay rates to give the illusion that these things are older.

Clutching at straws if you ask me, but it's something your uncle might say.
 
Please change the thread title, it's false advertisment! Thanks.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
3
Views
8K
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
18K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
5K