MHB Daughter's 6th grade homework question.

  • Thread starter Thread starter teddunner
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Homework
teddunner
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
I'm at a loss. I can't figure it out. Please help.

Last year's 6th grade boy to girl ratio was 3 to 4. This year's 6th grade boy to girl ratio is 5 to 6. If the total number of students were the same this year as they were last year; what is the number of 6th grade boys last year if there are 96 girls this year?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
teddunner said:
I'm at a loss. I can't figure it out. Please help.

Last year's 6th grade boy to girl ratio was 3 to 4. This year's 6th grade boy to girl ratio is 5 to 6. If the total number of students were the same this year as they were last year; what is the number of 6th grade boys last year if there are 96 girls this year?

(Wave)

Let $\text{boys_1}$ be the number of boys of last year's 6th grade, $\text{girls_1}$ the number of girls of last year's 6th grade, $\text{boys_2}$ the number of boys of this year's 6th grade and $\text{girls_2}$ the number of girls of this year's 6th grade.

Then the following relations hold:

$$\frac{\text{boys_1}}{\text{girls_1}}=\frac{3}{4}$$

$$\frac{\text{boys_2}}{\text{girls_2}}=\frac{5}{6}$$

$$\text{boys_1}+\text{girls_1}=\text{boys_2}+\text{girls_2}$$

We are looking for the value of $\text{boys_1}$.

We are given that $\text{girls_2}$ is equal to $96$.

So, $\text{boys_2}=\frac{5}{6} \cdot 96=80$.

Also we get that $\text{boys_1}+\text{girls_1}=176$.

Can you continue?
 
evinda said:
(Wave)

Let $\text{boys_1}$ be the number of boys of last year's 6th grade, $\text{girls_1}$ the number of girls of last year's 6th grade, $\text{boys_2}$ the number of boys of this year's 6th grade and $\text{girls_2}$ the number of girls of this year's 6th grade.

Then the following relations hold:

$$\frac{\text{boys_1}}{\text{girls_1}}=\frac{3}{4}$$

$$\frac{\text{boys_2}}{\text{girls_2}}=\frac{5}{6}$$

$$\text{boys_1}+\text{girls_1}=\text{boys_2}+\text{girls_2}$$

We are looking for the value of $\text{boys_1}$.

We are given that $\text{girls_2}$ is equal to $96$.

So, $\text{boys_2}=\frac{5}{6} \cdot 96=80$.

Also we get that $\text{boys_1}+\text{girls_1}=176$.

Can you continue?

I can continue, the answer just doesn't make sense. I think it is just an error that slipped through the cracks.
 
teddunner said:
I can continue, the answer just doesn't make sense. I think it is just an error that slipped through the cracks.

Yes, I made the calculations and noticed the same. (Nod)
 
evinda said:
Yes, I made the calculations and noticed the same. (Nod)

Thank you! I was beginning to think it was just me.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top