- #1
- 4,430
- 327
Listening now... will comment later
Last edited by a moderator:
Debate between Third Party candidates
- Context: News
- Thread starter Pythagorean
- Start date
Click For Summary
Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the upcoming debate between third-party candidates moderated by Larry King, scheduled for October 23, 2012. Participants express their thoughts on the inclusion of third-party candidates in political debates, the dynamics of such debates compared to those involving major party candidates, and the implications of their exclusion from mainstream debates.
Discussion Character
- Debate/contested
- Meta-discussion
Main Points Raised
- Some participants express support for third-party candidates like Gary Johnson and Jill Stein, questioning why they are excluded from debates with major party candidates.
- One participant suggests that the exclusion of third-party candidates may be due to their potential to challenge bipartisan agreements and disrupt the status quo.
- Another participant notes that major candidates see no benefit in debating third-party candidates, implying a strategic decision rather than a logistical one.
- There is a comparison made to Canadian political debates, where candidates engage more vigorously on platforms, contrasting this with the perceived lack of engagement in American debates.
- Some participants express skepticism about the effectiveness of third-party candidates, viewing them as less serious contenders.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants generally express disagreement regarding the effectiveness and seriousness of third-party candidates, as well as the reasons behind their exclusion from major debates. There is no consensus on the implications of these dynamics.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference specific political contexts and cultural differences between American and Canadian political debates, indicating a reliance on personal experiences and perceptions rather than established norms.