The discussion revolves around a documentary that some participants find questionable. The focus appears to be on the credibility of the claims made in the documentary, with an emphasis on the need for specificity regarding the points of contention.
Participants do not reach a consensus on the specific claims being contested, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the documentary's credibility.
There is a lack of specific examples or detailed critiques of the documentary's claims, which limits the depth of the discussion.
SpaceTiger said:Wolram, that documentary is over an hour long, do you think you could be a bit more specific about what you don't believe? Also, please try to avoid posting links to sites with porn advertisements along the border.