I Decoherence references and a question about the measurement problem

msumm21
Messages
247
Reaction score
28
TL;DR Summary
Questions on decoherence: references and a
Couple questions here.

1. What do you think is the best source to read about decoherence, both from an intuitive/high level pov, but also with mathematical details. I'd partially read a recommended paper by Schlosshauer a while back, is that still the bible for this?

2. If probabilities in quantum mechanics were themselves quantized (i.e. probabilities couldn't be any real number in [0,1] but had to be an integral multiple a some small number ##\epsilon##), would decoherence then solve the measurement problem? E.g. while interacting with "environments" potential measurement results would eventually have a probability below ##\epsilon## and hence vanish completely. All the probability would shift the single result measured. (Admittedly not sure if this makes sense--I either never got a good grasp of decoherence or I forgot it if I did.)
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Physics news on Phys.org
msumm21 said:
If probabilities in quantum mechanics were themselves quantized (i.e. probabilities couldn't be any real number in [0,1] but had to be an integral multiple a some small number ##\epsilon##)
I'm not sure anyone has ever proposed a coherent model with this property. So I don't know that questions about it are actually answerable since we don't have a model to use to answer them.
 
  • Like
Likes msumm21
msumm21 said:
Summary:: Questions on decoherence: references and a

Couple questions here.

1. What do you think is the best source to read about decoherence, both from an intuitive/high level pov, but also with mathematical details. I'd partially read a recommended paper by Schlosshauer a while back, is that still the bible for this?
Could this book be best suited for your needs?
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9783540357735
 
  • Like
Likes msumm21, DrClaude and Demystifier
msumm21 said:
Summary:: Questions on decoherence: references and a

I'd partially read a recommended paper by Schlosshauer a while back, is that still the bible for this?
Now the bible is his book that @StevieTNZ linked above.
 
PeterDonis said:
I'm not sure anyone has ever proposed a coherent model with this property.
I've seen it in the many world context, as a technicality that helps to derive the Born rule.
 
msumm21 said:
What do you think is the best source to read about decoherence,...
To start with:
Stephen L. Adler: Why Decoherence has not Solved the Measurement Problem: A Response to P.W. Anderson
https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0112095v3
 
  • Like
Likes physika, msumm21, Demystifier and 1 other person
msumm21 said:
1. What do you think is the best source to read about decoherence, both from an intuitive/high level pov, but also with mathematical details. I'd partially read a recommended paper by Schlosshauer a while back, is that still the bible for this?
I think Schlosshauer's book is still the standard reference if one wants to learn about how decoherence is related to the quantum-to-classical transition.

Decoherence itself, however, is primarily a physical process in open quantum systems which has measureable consequences. Schlosshauer is only scratching the surface of this. A more comprehensive reference here is "The Theory of Open Quantum Systems" by Breuer and Petruccione.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and msumm21
kith said:
I think Schlosshauer's book is still the standard reference if one wants to learn about how decoherence is related to the quantum-to-classical transition.

Decoherence itself, however, is primarily a physical process in open quantum systems which has measureable consequences. Schlosshauer is only scratching the surface of this. A more comprehensive reference here is "The Theory of Open Quantum Systems" by Breuer and Petruccione.
I would put it this way: Schlosshauer is mainly for foundations, Breuer and Petruccione is mainly for applications.
 
  • Like
Likes msumm21 and DrClaude

Similar threads

Back
Top