A Decomposing Rank-2 Tensors in Dirac's "General Theory of Relativity

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kostik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Tensors
Kostik
Messages
274
Reaction score
32
TL;DR Summary
Dirac says that a general rank-2 tensor ## T^{\mu\nu} ## can be decomposed as ## A^\mu B^\nu + A'^\mu B'^\nu + A''^\mu B''^\nu + \cdots\, ##. Is this obvious?
Dirac's book "General Theory of Relativity" says on p. 2 that a general rank-2 tensor can be written as a sum of outer products: $$ T^{\mu\nu} = A^\mu B^\nu + A'^\mu B'^\nu + A''^\mu B''^\nu + \cdots $$ Importantly, he repeats this on p. 18, in developing the covariant derivative, where he mentions that a tensor ## T_{\mu\nu} ## is "expressible as a sum of terms like ## A_\mu B_\nu ##".

Is this obvious? Can someone show or explain this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Kostik said:
TL;DR Summary: Dirac says that a general rank-2 tensor can be decomposed: ##T^\mu\nu = A^\mu B^\nu + A'^\mu B'^\nu + A''^\mu B''^\nu + ...##. Is this obvious?

Dirac's book "General Theory of Relativity" says on p. 2 that a general rank-2 tensor can be written as a sum of outer products:

$$T^\mu\nu = A^\mu B^\nu + A'^\mu B'^\nu + A''^\mu B''^\nu + ...$$

Importantly, he repeats this on p. 18, in developing the covariant derivative, where he mentions that a tensor ##T_\mu\nu$ is "expressible as a sum of terms like $A_\muB_\nu##".

Is this obvious? Can someone show or explain this?
By definition, a tensor of rank two can be written as
$$
T = T^{\mu\nu} e_\mu \otimes e_\nu
$$
We can introduce the vectors ##A^\nu = T^{\mu\nu} e_\mu## and ##B_\nu = e_\nu## (note that here ##\nu## is being used as a counter rather than a component index) and therefore
$$
T = A^\nu \otimes B_\nu
$$
 
I'm not familiar with your notation, I wonder if Dirac's decomposition can be explained using only his definition of tensors.
 
Last edited:
Kostik said:
I added the missing braces, but the LaTex still doesn't seem to be working in the original post.
It's a known issue when you make the first post to use LaTeX (OP or reply) on a page. The parser doesn't get loaded until you refresh the page. Your LaTeX looks fine to me, and will look fine to you once you've hit refresh.
 
Ibix said:
It's a known issue when you make the first post to use LaTeX (OP or reply) on a page. The parser doesn't get loaded until you refresh the page. Your LaTeX looks fine to me, and will look fine to you once you've hit refresh.
Aha, yes, I see it now.
 
Oh, I think it's actually fairly straightforward. Write (showing the summation explicitly): $$T^{\mu\nu}=\sum_{\lambda,\kappa}T^{\lambda\kappa}{\delta_\lambda}^\mu{\delta_\kappa}^\nu \,\,\,\,\text{(no Einstein summation)}$$ Then ##A^\mu = T^{\lambda\kappa}{\delta_\lambda}^\mu## (not summed over ##\lambda##) and ##B^\nu={\delta_\kappa}^\nu##. (Regard ##\lambda## and ##\kappa## as fixed.) Since everything in sight is a tensor, the ##A^\mu## and ##B^\nu## are obviously vectors (no need to worry about constructing a non-vector).
 
From $$0 = \delta(g^{\alpha\mu}g_{\mu\nu}) = g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} + g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu}$$ we have $$g^{\alpha\mu} \delta g_{\mu\nu} = -g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \,\, . $$ Multiply both sides by ##g_{\alpha\beta}## to get $$\delta g_{\beta\nu} = -g_{\alpha\beta} g_{\mu\nu} \delta g^{\alpha\mu} \qquad(*)$$ (This is Dirac's eq. (26.9) in "GTR".) On the other hand, the variation ##\delta g^{\alpha\mu} = \bar{g}^{\alpha\mu} - g^{\alpha\mu}## should be a tensor...
OK, so this has bugged me for a while about the equivalence principle and the black hole information paradox. If black holes "evaporate" via Hawking radiation, then they cannot exist forever. So, from my external perspective, watching the person fall in, they slow down, freeze, and redshift to "nothing," but never cross the event horizon. Does the equivalence principle say my perspective is valid? If it does, is it possible that that person really never crossed the event horizon? The...
Back
Top