Decomposition of irrep. of G_2 into irreps. of A_2

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter timb00
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The decomposition of the fundamental representation (7) of G2 into irreducible representations of A2 is established as 7 = 3 + \bar{3} + 1. The correct procedure involves using the extended Dynkin diagram and the Cartan subalgebra {a2, ax} for embedding A2 in G2. A normalization factor of 4/3 is crucial for deriving independent equations related to the weight projector. The final result confirms the decomposition into the specified irreducible representations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie algebras, specifically G2 and A2.
  • Familiarity with Dynkin diagrams and their extensions.
  • Knowledge of weight theory in representation theory.
  • Proficiency in matrix notation and linear algebra concepts.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the extended Dynkin diagram method for representation theory.
  • Explore the weight projector calculations in detail.
  • Review the normalization techniques in representation theory.
  • Read "Representation Theory" by Fulton and Harris, focusing on lecture 22.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and researchers in representation theory, particularly those focusing on Lie algebras and their applications in theoretical physics.

timb00
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody,

this is the first thread of mine. I try to recover the decomposition of
the fundamental representation (the 7) of G2 into irreducible representations of
A_2. It is given by

7 = 3 + \bar {3}[\tex] + 1<br /> <br /> It maid be that I didn&#039;t understand the procedure, founded by Dynkin, to use the <br /> extended Dynkin diagram. <br /> <br /> o<u>==</u>o--o<br /> a1 a2 ax<br /> <br /> Where the last root is the extension. The weights of the 7 are :<br /> <br /> {1, 2}, <br /> {1, 1},<br /> {0, 1}, <br /> {0, 0}, <br /> {0, -1}, <br /> {-1, -1}, <br /> {-1, -2}<br /> <br /> I&#039;am using the Cartan subalgebra {a2,ax} to embed the A_2 in G_2. I think that this is<br /> the point where I do a mistake? Maybe someone could help me with the decompostion.<br /> <br /> Thanks for reading<br /> <br /> Timb00
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can take a look at Fulton and Harris book "Representation Theory", lecture 22. It is about the Lie algebra \mathfrak g_2 and includes the branching law that you ask about.
 
Hey Guy's,

thanks for reading my thread. I found my mistake. It was just the wrong normalization.
If someone is interested I will make a sketch how I compute the weight projector.

For the A_2 I take the Cartan sub algebra to be generated out of {a'1,a'2}={4/3*a2,4/3*ax}. The factor of 4/3 is because of the normalization. Now it is possible to get two independent equations :

(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2) (a'1) =4/3(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2)(a2)=(n_1 a'_1 + n_2 a'_2)(a'1)
<=> 4/3(m_2 1/4-m_1/8) = n_1 1/3 - n_2 1/6

and

(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2) (a'2) =4/3(m_1 a1 + m_2 a2)(ax)=(n_1 a'_1 + n_2 a'_2)(a'2)
<=> 4/3(m_2 1/4) = n_2 1/3 - n_1 1/6

In matrix notation one finds :

A(m_1,m_2)^T = B (n_1,m_2)^T <=> P (m_1,m_2)^T = (n_1,m_2)^T

=> P = B^-1A

If one acts with P on the weights one findes that the set of G_2 weights decompose into
a 3 + {\bar 3} +1 .

Thanks, timb00.

P.s : hey martinbn, thanks for your answer. I saw it after I wrote the text. But I will have
a look into the Fulton.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
15K
  • · Replies 175 ·
6
Replies
175
Views
27K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K