Can Any Linear Operator Be Decomposed into Hermitian Components?

Click For Summary
Any linear operator can be expressed as a sum of Hermitian components, specifically in the form \hat{O} = \hat{O}' + i\hat{O}''. The operators \hat{O}' and \hat{O}'' can be derived from the relationships involving the adjoint of the operator, leading to the equations \hat{O}' = \frac{1}{2}(\hat{O} + \hat{O}^\dagger) and \hat{O}'' = \frac{1}{2i}(\hat{O} - \hat{O}^\dagger). The discussion emphasizes the importance of verifying that these components maintain the properties of Hermitian operators. Participants suggest experimenting with arbitrary vectors and eigenvalue equations to explore the decomposition further. The approach involves a combination of intuition and careful verification to ensure the solution meets the original problem's requirements.
dingo_d
Messages
199
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that any linear operator \hat{O} can be decomposed as \hat{O}=\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}'', where \hat{O}' and \hat{O}'' are Hermitian operators.

Homework Equations



Operator is Hermitian if:

T=T^{\dagger}

The Attempt at a Solution



I don't know where to start :\ Should I try to see for some arbitrary vector |\psi\rangle, that I can write it in some basis, and see what it would do to write eigenvalue equation with those operators?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Play with \hat{O}^\dagger+\hat{O} and i(\hat{O}^\dagger-\hat{O}).
 
Hmmm.

So \hat{O}^{\dagger}+\hat{O}=\hat{O}'^{\dagger}-i\hat{O}''^{\dagger}+\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}'' and since those with ' and '' are hermitian it follows:

\hat{O}^{\dagger}+\hat{O}=\hat{O}'-i\hat{O}''+\hat{O}'+i\hat{O}''=2\hat{O}'

Am I on the right track?
 
Not too bad ...
 
XD Too bad? XD

For the i(\hat{O}^\dagger-\hat{O}) part I got 2\hat{O}''

So I should somehow prove linear superposition or?
 
Well, so what is your guess for O' and O''? Guess what they should be, then check carefully if your guess has all the required properties.

This is how we often solve problems: we play, we guess, and the we check carefully, in all detail, if our guess really constitutes a solution of the original problem. The way towards a solution does not have to be logical. What needs to be logical is the verification.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K