Chemistry Decomposition of Sucrose: Understanding the Rate and Order of Reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter i_love_science
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Decomposition
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers around the decomposition of sucrose and whether it is a first-order or zero-order reaction. One participant argues that the reaction is first-order because a linear plot of ln[C12H22O11] versus time indicates this, with a rate constant (k) of 0.45 hr-1. However, another points out that the correct expression for the rate law is d[sucrose]/dt = -k[sucrose], suggesting the rate should be defined differently. The confusion arises from the interpretation of "rate" and a potential misprint in the exponent of the rate equation. Ultimately, clarity on the definition of "rate" and the correct form of the reaction is essential for resolving the discrepancy.
i_love_science
Messages
80
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
In an acid solution, sucrose (C12H22O11) will decompose into fructose and glucose. A plot of ln[C12H22O11] versus time gives a straight line with a slope of -0.45 hr^(-1). What is the rate law for this decomposition reaction?
Relevant Equations
rate law
I think this is a first order reaction because ln[C12H22O11] vs. time is linear. The k value is the negative of the slope. Therefore, my answer is rate = 0.45 hr-1 [C12H22O11].

The correct solution is rate = -0.45 hr-1 [C12H22O11]0. I don't understand why this is a zero order reaction, or why the k value is -0.45. Is the solution wrong? Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It depends how you define "rate of reaction". The rate law is
d[sucrose]/dt = -k[sucrose]
Then it depends whether you define "rate" as d[sucrose]/dt or -d[sucrose]/dt
Note that the question as you quote it asks for the rate law, not the rate. Is it you that's defining "rate"?
You are right that a linear plot of lnC vs. t indicates a first order reaction. I suspect that the exponent 0 is a misprint.
 
  • Like
Likes i_love_science
mjc123 said:
You are right that a linear plot of lnC vs. t indicates a first order reaction. I suspect that the exponent 0 is a misprint.
Or the lnC vs t should be just C vs t.
 
Possibly, but that wouldn't give a slope with units hr-1.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top