Decreasing Order of Stability in unsaturated 6C Rings

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the stability order of unsaturated six-membered rings, specifically evaluating different proposed orders of stability among four compounds. Participants explore the factors influencing stability, such as hyperconjugation and the positioning of double bonds, while referencing a hypothesis related to ring stability.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a stability order of IV > I > II > III, suggesting that hyperconjugation plays a role in determining stability.
  • Another participant supports the stability order A) IV > I > II > III, citing the relative stability of exocyclic versus internal double bonds in six-membered rings.
  • A different viewpoint questions the reliability of educational content regarding Brown's Hypothesis and seeks clarification on its establishment.
  • A participant humorously attempts to justify their stability order by analyzing the number of possible structures for hyperconjugation in compounds I and II.
  • Brown's Hypothesis is introduced, stating that exocyclic double bonds in six-membered rings are more reactive than those within the ring, while the opposite is true for five-membered rings.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing opinions on the correct stability order, with some supporting option A and others favoring option D. The discussion remains unresolved regarding which order is definitively correct.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference hyperconjugation and the positioning of double bonds as factors influencing stability, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these factors or the validity of the proposed orders.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students and researchers in organic chemistry, particularly those studying the stability of cyclic compounds and the effects of structural variations on reactivity.

AGNuke
Gold Member
Messages
455
Reaction score
9
Decreasing Stability order of given I, II, III, IV (in order)
cho2.png


A)IV>I>II>III
B)I>IV>III>II
C)I>II>IV>III
D)IV>II>I>III (My Answer)

Since the IV is most stable, only A and D answers are worth checking. They only differ by stability order of I and II.

Then I checked by determining their stability due to hyperconjugation. I has HC3 while II has HC4, hence my answer D. But the correct answer is A. Any suggestions, whether my answer or provided answer is correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it's A). Exocyclic double bonds are less stable than internal double bonds for 6-member rings but exocyclic double bonds are more stable than internal double bonds for 5-member rings.

Have you heard of Brown's Hypothesis?
 
Never heard of it. I doubt about this knowledge shared in 12th standard, even more so considering the standard of education I've been provided here. I would be grateful if you were to enlighten me briefly on how this hypothesis is established.

Still, as a last resort, I tried using my old habit of giving bluff explanation to support the answer (even if it isn't :-p) and drew out the structures possible in Hyperconjugation

For I
HC1.png


For II
HC2.png


Since I has 6 structure while II has 5 structures, I is more stable :biggrin: (I know I am talented :blushing:)
 
Brown's hypothesis simply states that exocyclic double bonds to six-member rings are more reactive than double bonds inside the ring and double bonds exocyclic to a five-member ring are more stable than those within the five-member ring. This is supported by reactivity data.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
11K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 178 ·
6
Replies
178
Views
10K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K