Dedekind Cuts Question (Conceptual)

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mindarson
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conceptual
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of Dedekind cuts in the construction of real numbers from rational numbers. The user questions how to determine the position of a cut corresponding to an irrational number, such as sqrt(2), without already knowing the number itself. The response clarifies that the construction involves considering all rational limits, specifically using the property that all rationals squared must be less than 2 to define the cut for sqrt(2). It emphasizes that the reals are defined as sets of subsets of rationals, where each subset includes all rationals to the left of a given point.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Dedekind cuts
  • Familiarity with rational and irrational numbers
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis
  • Concept of limits in mathematics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the formal definition of Dedekind cuts in real analysis
  • Explore the properties of irrational numbers and their representation
  • Learn about the construction of real numbers using Cauchy sequences
  • Investigate the relationship between limits and the completeness of the real numbers
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching foundational concepts in number theory, and anyone interested in the rigorous construction of real numbers.

mindarson
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I have just begun a self-study program in analysis and have a question about Dedekind cuts.

My question is this: My understanding is that cuts are constructions by which to define the reals in terms of the rationals. I.e. the reals are a set of cuts, each of which is a set of rationals. And a cut is the set of rationals to the left of (or less than?) a certain point.

So my real question is: If we must use cuts to construct the reals, how do we know WHERE to cut in order to construct the cut that corresponds to an irrational, real number like sqrt(2)? How is this reasoning not circular? If we DO NOT HAVE the number yet, then how can we even talk about objects TO THE LEFT of the number (or oriented in any way with respect to it)?

Thanks for taking the time to read and consider.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What you actually do is consider all limits in the rationals. For instance to construct the square root of 2 just take all cuts such that all rationals in it are smaller than 2 when squared. Here no irrational number is used in any way just rationals and being able to square.

There can be no knowing where to cut, because there is in this construction nowhere to cut. You construct the reals as a set of subsets if the rationals namely all the subsets where is a rational is included also all rationals to the left of it are included.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K