Deducing the solution of the von Neumann equation

xyver
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[tex]\hat{\rho}(t)=?[/tex] [tex] |\psi(t)\rangle=U(t,t_{0})|\psi(t_{0})\rangle[/tex] [tex] \imath\hbar\partial_{t}\hat{p}=[\hat{H},\hat{\rho}] [/tex]

Homework Equations


[tex] \imath\hbar\partial_{t}\hat{p}=[\hat{H},\hat{\rho}] \Leftrightarrow\imath\hbar\partial_{t}\hat{p}=\hat{H}\hat{\rho}-\hat{\rho}\hat{H}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I already know the solution: [tex]\hat{\rho}(t)=\hat{U}\hat{\rho}(0)\hat{U}^{+}[/tex]
But where do I get this from? How do I know that I have to write the time evolution operator multiplied once in front of the density operator and once the Hermitian conjugate after it?

Also, I tried to verify the solution:
[tex]\Rightarrow\imath\hbar\partial_{t}\hat{U}\hat{\rho}(0)\hat{U}^{+}=\hat{H}\hat{U}\hat{\rho}(0)\hat{U}^{+}-\hat{U}\hat{\rho}(0)\hat{U}^{+}\hat{H}=[H,\hat{\rho}(t)][/tex]
Can't I take any other operator instead of the time evolution operator at this place, since in my attempt to verify the solution the [itex]\hat{U}[/itex] goes away again?

Or is this just guessing as one way to solve a differential equation. Then, still, how do you get the idea?
 
Last edited:
Why don't you use the definition of the von Neumann density operator ?
 
The definition should be [itex]\hat{\rho}=\sum_{i}p_{n}|\psi(t)\rangle\langle\psi(t)|[/itex]
I can do with that:
[tex]\partial_{t}\hat{\rho}=\partial_{t}\sum_{i}p_{n}| \psi(t)\rangle\langle\psi(t)|+ \sum_{i} p_{n}|\psi(t) \rangle\partial_{t}\langle\psi(t)| \Leftrightarrow[/tex][tex] <br /> \partial_{t}\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{\imath\hbar}Hp_{n}|\psi(t)\rangle\langle\psi(t)|+\sum_{i}p_{n}|\psi(t)\rangle\frac{1}{\imath\hbar}H\langle\psi(t)| \Leftrightarrow[/tex][tex] \partial_{t}\hat{\rho}=\frac{1}{\imath\hbar}\hat{H}p_{n}|\psi(t)\rangle\langle\psi(t)|+\frac{1}{ \imath\hbar}\sum_{i}p_{n}|\psi(t)\rangle\langle \psi(t)\hat{H}|[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K