MHB Dee Gayle's Question about Melodies in Facebook

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sudharaka
  • Start date Start date
Sudharaka
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,558
Reaction score
1
Dee Gayle on Facebook writes:

HELP! How many simple eight note melodies are possible using only 1 octave with no sharps/flats (8 notes)? Explain each step and show the calculation.

the answer should be in the billions..I believe the first part is simply 8^8 but I don't know what else I need to multiply to come up with the correct answer..
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Dee, :)

Yes for the first choice you have 8 notes to choose from, for the second note you have again 8 notes to choose from and so on. So from the Rule of Product we get, \(8^8=16777216\). Here we are assuming that we are only playing one note at a time and that repetition of notes are okay.
 
Hmmmm, I thought the answer would me more complicated than that, because 8 notes with 12 intervals = 78,364,164,096 (according to research online), so I assumed since there are only 4 less intervals, my answer should also be in the billions. Also, the subject is statistics. Thanks
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top