Defining a displacement vector not touching the origin

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the representation of displacement vectors, specifically the vector BC in relation to OA. It emphasizes that while the position of a vector can be shifted without altering its magnitude and direction, this principle does not apply when distinguishing between vectors like BC and OA. The example of a ball thrown from a tower illustrates the misunderstanding of treating a vector as a specific interval rather than a directional quantity. The key takeaway is that vectors are defined by their magnitude and direction, independent of their position in space. Clarifying these concepts is essential for accurately representing displacement vectors.
Hijaz Aslam
Messages
66
Reaction score
1
zQCV1Ts.png


In the diagram let the magnitude of the vector BC and OA are 'x'. I am confused with this part. Vectorially we don't say that the vector BC is ##-x##, because ##-x## is represented by OA. Then how do we represent BC?

It's said a the position of a vector doesn't matter, I mean one can shift it in any way unless their magnitude and direction are changed, is it applicable to a displacement vector? As in the case above we just can't shift the vector ##-x## to BC and call it ##-x##. For instance in the case of a ball thrown from a tower. If we take the origin as the top of the tower, we can always say the last ##x## meters of the tower. Am I confusing any concept?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are confusing "vector" with a specific interval, "the last x meters of a tower".
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K