Define Free Will: Satisfactory Definition?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Skomatth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Free will
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on defining "free will" using a logical positivist approach, specifically through the proposition "[agent]A has free will." The proposed definition states that at any time t, even with complete knowledge of A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis can predict A's state at time t+d. This definition aims to distinguish free will from randomness while emphasizing that the agent's actions must be rationally comprehensible and aimed at achieving a purpose.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of logical positivism
  • Familiarity with philosophical concepts of free will
  • Knowledge of propositions in logical analysis
  • Basic grasp of rationality and purpose in decision-making
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of logical positivism in philosophy
  • Research various definitions of free will in contemporary philosophy
  • Examine the relationship between free will and determinism
  • Investigate the role of rationality in human decision-making processes
USEFUL FOR

Philosophers, students of logic, and anyone interested in the complexities of free will and its implications in rational behavior.

Skomatth
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
Following the the logical positivist convention of defining a term in use I am seeking a definition of free will as it occurs in the proposition "[agent]A has free will". This will involve formulating an equivalent proposition which uses no synonyms of "free will".

I believe it can be done in this way: "At any time t, even if all facts are known about A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis could ever be able to predict A's physical or psychological state at time t+d."

Is this a satisfactory definition?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Skomatth said:
Following the the logical positivist convention of defining a term in use I am seeking a definition of free will as it occurs in the proposition "[agent]A has free will". This will involve formulating an equivalent proposition which uses no synonyms of "free will".

I believe it can be done in this way: "At any time t, even if all facts are known about A's physical and psychological state, no reliable hypothesis could ever be able to predict A's physical or psychological state at time t+d."

Is this a satisfactory definition?

How does this distinguish "freely willed" from random? In general how can you define an inner condition like will in terms of external behavior?
 
Good point. Do you think free will is an unanalysable concept or could this be defined differently?
 
selfAdjoint said:
How does this distinguish "freely willed" from random? In general how can you define an inner condition like will in terms of external behavior?

You need to add a rider to the effect that the agent's action is nonetheless
rationally comprehensible ie aimed at achieving some purpose.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
612
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
11K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K