Defining the square root of an unbounded linear operator

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on defining the square root of an unbounded linear operator, specifically modifications of Schrödinger operators of the form H = -Δ + V(x). The challenge arises because the spectral theorem typically applies to bounded Borel functions, while the square root function is unbounded. Participants clarify that the square root is used in a paper to prove a lemma characterizing the operator H. They mention that powers of operators can be defined through spectral decomposition or trans-Fourier techniques, which are applicable regardless of whether the operator is bounded. The relevant lemma can be found on page 15 of the cited arXiv paper.
AxiomOfChoice
Messages
531
Reaction score
1
I have started coming across square roots (H+kI)^{\frac 12} of slight modifications of Schrodinger operators H on L^2(\mathbb R^d); that is, operators that look like this:
<br /> H = -\Delta + V(x),<br />
where \Delta is the d-dimensional Laplacian and V corresponds to multiplication by some function. But how do we go about defining (H+kI)^{1/2}? My understanding was that we defined functions of self-adjoint operators by using the spectral theorem, but that only holds for bounded Borel functions, right? And f(x) = \sqrt x certainly isn't bounded. And because of the \Delta, the operator H isn't even bounded. So what do we do?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
dextercioby said:
How did you get the square root ?

What exactly do you mean? Are you asking how the square root is being used in the paper? From what I can tell, they are using the square root as a tool to prove a lemma that characterizes the operator H itself. Not sure that answers your question though...
 
Yes, I want to know the context they use the square root. Hopefully it's a free paper, I can't get in a journal behind a pay-wall.
 
dextercioby said:
Yes, I want to know the context they use the square root. Hopefully it's a free paper, I can't get in a journal behind a pay-wall.

Ok, sure! I think it's on the arXiv: http://arxiv.org/pdf/math-ph/0304009.pdf. The relevant lemma is on pg. 15; it's Lemma 5.1.
 
The powers of the operators can be defined through their spectral decomposition or by trans-Fourier-ing their (eigen)vectors, so that the power is transferred onto regular functions. These 2 'tricks' work irrespective whether the operator is bounded or not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K