Since a particle does not have a well defined position (before measurement), it also does not have a well defined velocity. But it seems like we can define a velocity distribution.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

Suppose we observe a particle at position x=0 at time t=0. If at a later time t we observe it at x, the observed velocity is v=x/t. The probability of observing it at x at time t (and hence observing velocity v), is P(v,t) = |ψ(x,t)|[itex]^{2}[/itex].

The expected value of v, will then be <v> = ∫v |ψ(x,t)|[itex]^{2}[/itex]dx = ∫(x/t) |ψ(x,t)|[itex]^{2}[/itex]dx. Since momentum p = mv, <p> = m<v> = m ∫(x/t) |ψ(x,t)|[itex]^{2}[/itex]dx.

Is this correct? Is this consistent with the known result that <p> = m d<x>/dt ?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Defining velocity distribution

Loading...

Similar Threads - Defining velocity distribution | Date |
---|---|

A Velocity dependence of operators in Inonu-Wigner contraction | Jan 31, 2018 |

A Defining Krauss operators with normal distribution | Jan 22, 2018 |

I Timelike Killing vectors & defining a vacuum state | Jul 28, 2017 |

I Defining exchange statistics of anyons in terms of Berry phase | Mar 17, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**