Definition of a unique function

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jonsploder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the definition of a unique function, specifically whether functions defined by the same expression but over different domains are considered the same function or different functions. The scope includes formal definitions of functions, domain and codomain considerations, and implications of these definitions in mathematical contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that functions defined by the same expression but over different domains are different functions, emphasizing that the domain is part of a function's identity.
  • Others clarify that both functions can be seen as restrictions of a broader function defined over the entire real line.
  • One participant states that the formal definition of a function includes its domain and codomain, suggesting that different domains or codomains imply different functions.
  • Another participant reinforces this definition, noting that two functions are equal only if their domains and codomains are the same and they produce the same outputs for all inputs in their respective domains.
  • A later reply critiques a more lenient interpretation of function equality, providing an example to illustrate that such a definition could lead to incorrect conclusions about surjectivity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the domain is a crucial aspect of a function's identity, but there is some contention regarding the implications of this on function equality and the treatment of codomains.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the formal definitions and their applications, particularly in relation to how codomains are treated in different contexts.

jonsploder
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm wondering whether an expression which is used to describe a function in a certain domain is a different function for the same expression with a differing domain.

For example: expression; x^2.
f(x) = x^2 for domain {1 < x < 10}
f(x) = x^2 for domain {10 < x < 11}

Are these two f(x)'s the same function, or different functions, by definition. I couldn't be sure by Wikipedia, and it's a difficult question to type into a search engine.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
hi jonsploder! welcome to pf! :smile:
jonsploder said:
… Are these two f(x)'s the same function, or different functions …

they're different

they're both restrictions of the same function defined on the whole of R :wink:
 
Thanks for the welcome, and the reply.
I know that they are different, however I was wondering, by the most formal definition of a function, whether they are different functions, or if indeed the domain of a function constitutes its identity as a function.
 
jonsploder said:
I know that they are different, however I was wondering, by the most formal definition of a function, whether they are different functions, or if indeed the domain of a function constitutes its identity as a function.

they're functions, and they're different

so they're different functions

the definition of a function includes its range and domain: different range and/or domain, different functions
 
jonsploder said:
Thanks for the welcome, and the reply.
I know that they are different, however I was wondering, by the most formal definition of a function, whether they are different functions, or if indeed the domain of a function constitutes its identity as a function.

The domain and codomain are part of the definition of a function.

Two functions [itex]f : A \to B[/itex] and [itex]g : C \to D[/itex] are equal if and only if [itex]A = C[/itex] and [itex]B = D[/itex] and for all [itex]a \in A[/itex], [itex]f(a) = g(a)[/itex].
 
pasmith said:
Two functions [itex]f : A \to B[/itex] and [itex]g : C \to D[/itex] are equal if and only if [itex]A = C[/itex] and [itex]B = D[/itex] and for all [itex]a \in A[/itex], [itex]f(a) = g(a)[/itex].
This definition is exactly correct. That should be your definition.

...

It's worth noting, however, that sometimes people get lazy about codomains and say [itex]f : A \to B[/itex] and [itex]g : C \to D[/itex] are equal when [itex]A = C[/itex] and for all [itex]a \in A[/itex], [itex]f(a) = g(a) \in B\cap D[/itex].
 
economicsnerd said:
It's worth noting, however, that sometimes people get lazy about codomains and say [itex]f : A \to B[/itex] and [itex]g : C \to D[/itex] are equal when [itex]A = C[/itex] and for all [itex]a \in A[/itex], [itex]f(a) = g(a) \in B\cap D[/itex].

To explain why this definition is bad, consider
##f : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}##, ##f(x) = 0##
##g : \mathbb{R} \to \{0\}##, ##g(x) = 0##.
Note that under the definition economicnerd gave these would be considered equal. However, g is a surjection while f is not.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
12K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K